ArticleScientific reports2025
Linking sequence restoration capability of shuffled coronary angiography to coronary artery disease diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The potential of the sequence in Coronary Angiography (CA) frames for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD) has been largely overlooked. Our study aims to reveal the "Sequence Value" embedded within these frames and to explore methods for its application in diagnostics. We conduct a survey via Amazon Mturk (Mechanical Turk) to evaluate the effectiveness of Sequence Restoration Capability in indicating CAD. Furthermore, we develop a self-supervised deep learning model to automatically assess this capability. Additionally, we ensure the robustness of our results by differently selecting coronary angiographies/modules for statistical analysis. Our self-supervised deep learning model achieves an average AUC of 80.1% across five-fold validation, demonstrating robustness against static data noise and efficiency, with calculations completed within 30 s. This study uncovers significant insights into CAD diagnosis through the sequence value in coronary angiography. We successfully illustrate methodologies for harnessing this potential, contributing valuable knowledge to the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.