ArticleScientific reports2025
Explainable machine learning model based on EEG, ECG, and clinical features for predicting neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest patient.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications and challenges of biomarker-based predictive models in proactive health management.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Temporal trends in post-cardiac arrest brain injury research: a bibliometric analysis of evolving priorities and translation gaps.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- From brain waves to heartbeats: Exploring the combined role of electroencephalography and heart-rate variability in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and management.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Review
- A joint CNN-Bi-LSTM-transformer architecture with SHAP explanations for multi-label arrhythmia detection from 12-lead ECGs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cross-modal synchronization of EEG and ECG reveals hidden signatures of recovery in traumatic brain injury.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Multimodal Artificial Intelligence for Precision Critical Care: A Scoping Review.Health data science · 2026Review
- Associations of serum sTREM-1 and sTREM-2 with mortality and neurological prognosis in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest: a machine learning-based approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in neurocardiology: decoding brain-heart network interactions for clinical and translational insights.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Explainable and externally validated machine learning for neurocognitive diagnosis via ECGs.General psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early and accurate prediction of neurological outcomes in comatose patients following cardiac arrest is critical for informed clinical decision-making. Existing studies have predominantly focused on EEG for assessing brain injury, with some exploring ECG data. However, the integration of EEG, ECG, and clinical features remains insufficiently investigated, and its potential to enhance predictive accuracy has not been fully established. Moreover, the limited interpretability of current models poses significant barriers to clinical application. Using the I-CARE database, we analyzed EEG, ECG, and clinical data from comatose cardiac arrest patients. After rigorous preprocessing and feature engineering, machine learning models (Logistic Regression, SVM, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting) were developed. Performance was evaluated through AUC-ROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, with SHAP applied to interpret feature contributions. Our multi-modal model outperformed single-modality models, achieving AUC values from 0.75 to 1.0. Notably, the model's accuracy peaked at a critical point within the 12-24 h window (e.g., 18 h, AUC = 1.0), surpassing EEG-only (AUC 0.7-0.8) and ECG-only (AUC < 0.6) models. SHAP identified Shockable Rhythm as the most influential feature (mean SHAP value 0.17), emphasizing its role in predictive accuracy. This study presents a novel multi-modal approach that significantly enhances early neurological outcome prediction in critical care. SHAP-based interpretability further supports clinical applicability, paving the way for more personalized patient management post-cardiac arrest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.