Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181037›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Explainable machine learning model based on EEG, ECG, and clinical features for predicting neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest patient.

Yanxiang Niu, Xin Chen, Jianqi Fan, Chunli Liu, Menghao Fang, Ziquan Liu, Xiangyan Meng, Yanqing Liu, Lu Lu, Haojun Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yanxiang Niu *Institute of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xin Chen *Institute of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Jianqi Fan *College Of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Chunli LiuInstitute of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Menghao FangSchool of Cyber Science and Engineering, University of International Relations, Beijing, China.
Ziquan LiuInstitute of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xiangyan MengInstitute of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Yanqing LiuInstitute of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Lu LuInstitute of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. lulu_9983@tju.edu.cn.
Haojun FanInstitute of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. fanhaojun999@126.com.

Funding

the National Key R&D Program of China No. 2021YFC3002200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early and accurate prediction of neurological outcomes in comatose patients following cardiac arrest is critical for informed clinical decision-making. Existing studies have predominantly focused on EEG for assessing brain injury, with some exploring ECG data. However, the integration of EEG, ECG, and clinical features remains insufficiently investigated, and its potential to enhance predictive accuracy has not been fully established. Moreover, the limited interpretability of current models poses significant barriers to clinical application. Using the I-CARE database, we analyzed EEG, ECG, and clinical data from comatose cardiac arrest patients. After rigorous preprocessing and feature engineering, machine learning models (Logistic Regression, SVM, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting) were developed. Performance was evaluated through AUC-ROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, with SHAP applied to interpret feature contributions. Our multi-modal model outperformed single-modality models, achieving AUC values from 0.75 to 1.0. Notably, the model's accuracy peaked at a critical point within the 12-24 h window (e.g., 18 h, AUC = 1.0), surpassing EEG-only (AUC 0.7-0.8) and ECG-only (AUC < 0.6) models. SHAP identified Shockable Rhythm as the most influential feature (mean SHAP value 0.17), emphasizing its role in predictive accuracy. This study presents a novel multi-modal approach that significantly enhances early neurological outcome prediction in critical care. SHAP-based interpretability further supports clinical applicability, paving the way for more personalized patient management post-cardiac arrest.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyElectroencephalographyHeart ArrestMachine LearningAgedComaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisROC CurveCardiac arrestHeart rate variabilityMachine learningMulti-modal evaluationQuantitative EEGSHAP analysis

Identifiers

PMID40181037
PMCPMC11968807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.