Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181012›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An experimental study on the susceptibility of purchasing managers to greenwashing.

Owais Khan, Andreas Hinterhuber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Owais KhanVenice School of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, San Giobbe, Cannaregio 873, 30121, Venice, Italy. owais.khan@unive.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9260-210X
Andreas HinterhuberVenice School of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, San Giobbe, Cannaregio 873, 30121, Venice, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8708-5988

Funding

European Union Next-GenerationEU - PRIN H53D23002480006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Greenwashing-the deliberate exaggeration or fabrication of environmental claims-undermines trust, disrupts transparency, and poses a significant barrier to genuine progress toward sustainability. This scenario-based experimental study examines whether purchasing managers, key stakeholders in organizational procurement, can reliably differentiate between greenwashed and certified sustainable products. Using three carefully designed purchasing scenarios-laptops, safety gloves, and copy paper-responses were collected from 465 purchasing managers across the EU, a region notable for its regulatory emphasis on eco-certifications. The findings reveal no statistically significant differences in willingness to pay (WTP) for products with greenwashed claims versus those backed by stringent certifications, with average WTP values varying only slightly between groups. These findings highlight a critical vulnerability to greenwashing, even among experienced professionals, raising concerns about the credibility of sustainability claims in influencing procurement decisions. The study underscores the need for systemic reforms, including the standardization of certification systems and enhanced decision-making tools, to mitigate greenwashing's pervasive impact and foster authentic corporate sustainability.

Indexed as

CertificationsCognitive biasesGreenwashingOrganizational procurementSustainabilityWillingness to pay

Identifiers

PMID40181012
PMCPMC11968802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.