ArticleScientific reports2025
Dementia classification using two-channel electroencephalography features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative sleep EEG identifies CSF core biomarker-related subgroups in Alzheimer's disease.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Risk of a Dementia Diagnosis in Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Normal MMSE Scores in the United States.American journal of medicine open · 2026Article
- A Consolidated Framework for the Detection of Alzheimer's Disease Using EEG Signals and Hybrid Models.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neurophysiological correlates of taVNS-mediated cognitive enhancement.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Article
- Classification of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease based on resting state scalp-recorded electroencephalogram-derived indices.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a novel classification model using wearable two-channel electroencephalography (EEG) data to differentiate between patients with dementia and normal controls (NCs). We employed an extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost) model combined with recursive feature elimination with cross-validation (RFECV) to classify patients and NCs. The study included 54 NCs and 29 patients with dementia. Resting-state EEG was recorded, and Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) assessments were conducted. Significant differences were observed in peak frequency (PF), alpha (A), theta (T), the ratio of alpha to theta (A/T), the ratio of alpha to low-beta (A/BL), and coherence (CH) between patients and NCs. Patients with dementia exhibited decreases in PF, CH_A/T, CH_A/BL, A/T, and A/BL, while an increase in T was noted. The primary finding was that the Xgboost model, a tree ensemble classification, achieved a balanced accuracy of 97.05% with the RFECV-selected feature, which was PF. This study suggests that the novel Xgboost with RFECV classification model using two-channel EEG data could be a valuable tool for diagnosing dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.