ArticleScientific reports2025
Crosslinking a nanocomposite by zirconium sulfate to synthesize a high-durable new-generation polymer gel.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enhancing the stability of polymer gels under harsh conditions is vital for improving enhanced oil recovery (EOR) applications. This study introduces a novel gel synthesized using a MgO-HPAM nanocomposite and zirconium sulfate crosslinker (CL). The gel demonstrates exceptional durability, capable of maintaining its properties under high temperature and salinity, addressing long-standing challenges in EOR. The research involved several key experiments. Initial tests revealed that MgO does not influence gelation time; this is controlled by polymer and CL concentrations. The nanocomposite significantly improved the storage modulus, with increases of 72.47% and 84.52% at 250 and 500 ppm MgO, respectively. Syneresis studies showed that after 50 days, gels with 250 ppm nanocomposite retained 88% of their weight, unlike the nanocomposite-free gels which lost 75%. In core flooding experiments, nanocomposite gels demonstrated higher injection pressure and reduced permeability compared to nano-free gels. SEM imaging confirmed nanoparticle agglomeration in the sand face, enhancing the gel's barrier properties. Over 50 days at 90 °C and 2000 psi, permeability reductions were observed at 58%, 98.1%, and 97.9% across the samples. These findings underscore the potential of this gel in advancing EOR techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.