ArticleScientific reports2025
Influential nodes identification for complex networks based on multi-feature fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing peer-led health interventions: A social network analysis approach for identifying influential fishermen in Malawi.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- The impact of intention to adopt generative AI for exercise information on exercise adherence among Chinese college students: the mediating role of autonomous motivation and network analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Evaluating and optimizing ecological networks in the Hubei Yangtze river economic belt using an importance-sensitivity and circuit-graph approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
dentifying critical nodes in complex networks presents a significant challenge that has garnered extensive research attention. Previous studies often overlook the importance of spatial information, thereby limiting the accurate identification of key nodes. To address this gap, we introduce an advanced centrality model, termed Degree-k-shell-Betweenness Centrality (DKBC), which is grounded in the principle of gravity. The DKBC model integrates the centrality attributes of node degree, spatial positioning, and intermediate degree, resulting in improved accuracy for key node identification in complex networks. This innovative approach outperforms traditional gravity-based methods in terms of effectiveness. We validated the diffusion capacity of the proposed model using the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) epidemic model and the Independent Cascade (IC) model, assessing correlation through the Kendall coefficient τ. A comparative analysis with benchmark algorithms highlights the superior performance of the DKBC model. Empirical validation across twelve real-world networks demonstrates the model's exceptional accuracy in identifying key nodes. This study significantly advances the field by illustrating the effectiveness of incorporating spatial information into centrality measures to enhance both network analysis and practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.