Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40180965›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Why cutting is easier than tearing elastomers.

Donghao Zhao, Alex Cartier, Tetsuharu Narita, Frederic Lechenault, Costantino Creton, Matteo Ciccotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Donghao ZhaoLaboratoire de Sciences et Ingénierie de la Matière Molle, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL University, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8791-7054
Alex CartierLaboratoire de Sciences et Ingénierie de la Matière Molle, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL University, Paris, France.
Tetsuharu NaritaLaboratoire de Sciences et Ingénierie de la Matière Molle, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL University, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2061-1357
Frederic LechenaultLaboratoire de Physique de l'École normale supérieure, ENS, CNRS, PSL University, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6432-5240
Costantino CretonLaboratoire de Sciences et Ingénierie de la Matière Molle, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL University, Paris, France. costantino.creton@espci.psl.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0177-9680
Matteo CiccottiLaboratoire de Sciences et Ingénierie de la Matière Molle, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL University, Paris, France. matteo.ciccotti@espci.psl.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2707-9217

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) AdG no. 695351 (CHEMECH)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tearing tough soft solids such as rubbers, leather or meat is much harder than cutting them with a sharp blade. To understand why, we use samples labeled with mechanically sensitive fluorophores to investigate cutting and fracture behavior in PDMS elastomers and quantify the extent of bond scission resulting from cutting pre-stretched samples. Our findings reveal that stretch-induced cracks produce significant deformation, bond scission and blunting near the crack tip, requiring more energy to propagate. In contrast, using blades reduces the amount of stretching and blunting required for crack propagation, resulting in a lower fracture energy. The measured linear correlation between fracture energy and the areal density of broken chains clarifies the relationship between pre-stretching, blunting, and molecular damage. These multi-scale insights demonstrate the key differences between fracture and cutting mechanics of soft materials, allowing to optimize engineering applications, such as rubber and food processing, energy-efficient recycling, biomedical and surgical devices, protective equipment and sports gear.

Identifiers

PMID40180965
PMCPMC11968795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.