ArticleSleep health2025
An ecological analysis of sleep health across five African-origin populations spanning the epidemiologic transition.
Article in Sleep health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSleep health is emerging as a public health priority due to its strong associations with several key domains of health. However, most of the existing literature are from studies located in high income settings and may not be representative of low-middle income settings. Leveraging the Modeling the Epidemiologic Transition Study, a study of cardiometabolic disease risk in five diverse African-origin populations, we explored differences in objectively measured sleep behavior across cohorts from Ghana, South Africa, Jamaica, Seychelles, and the United States.
methodsData from 809 participants (35-55 years old, 63% women) from the 5 Modeling the Epidemiologic Transition Study research sites were included. Objectively-measured sleep, using actigraphy, was scored according to the criteria of Patel and colleagues. For those with at least 5 nights of valid data, ecological mean sleep onset time, wake-up time, sleep duration, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency were examined.
findingsAdjusted models indicate that sleep onset was earlier in all sites when compared to US (p<.005). Sleep efficiency varied by locations, being lower in participants from Ghana, South Africa, and Jamaica when compared to United States (Ghana β: -3.7, South Africa: -5.8, Jamaica: -1.3, p<.05 for all) and higher in Seychelles when compared to United States (Seychelles β: 1.6; p=.02). Women presented with shorter sleep duration but with higher sleep efficiency.
interpretationSleep duration, timing (wake time, midsleep time and sleep onset), and efficiency differ by country and sex, likely driven by socio-economic settings. Understanding sleep patterns in different contexts is needed to make informed and culturally appropriate health recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.