ArticleSpine deformity2025
Early reoperations do not adversely affect long-term pain and activity scores in adult deformity patients.
Article in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients reoperated within six months of their index surgery to patients without readmissions/reoperations and note any similarities/dissimilarities in activity and pain outcomes.
methodsASD patients who underwent spinal fusion at a single institution with minimum two years follow-up were included. Patients without readmissions/reoperations (No Reops) were compared to those requiring early reoperation resolved by six months post-index procedure (Early Reop) cohort. Outcomes included 2Y PROs, improvement, and MCID attainment. Question 22 from the SRS-22r, assessing likelihood of choosing the same treatment, was separately evaluated.
results238 patients [211(89%) No Reops; 27(11%) Early Reop] were included. Early reoperations were associated with PJK/DJK (29.63%, n = 8), implant dislodgement (18.52%, n = 5), and pedicle/vertebral fracture (14.81%, n = 4). There was no difference in demographics, operative characteristics, baseline alignment, and preoperative PROs. PRO improvement was not significantly different for SRS Activity (p = 0.392), Pain (p = 0.291), Appearance (p = 0.179), Mental Health (p = 0.840), Satisfaction (p = 0.098), Total score (p = 0.152), and ODI (p = 0.564). MCID achievement was comparable for SRS Activity (p = 0.536), Pain (p = 0.115), Appearance (p = 0.269), Mental Health (p > 0.999), Satisfaction (p = 0.149), and ODI (p = 0.403). SRS total score MCID attainment was greater for No Reops Cohort (82% vs 70%, p = 0.048). In addition, a greater proportion of No Reop patients endorsed that they would choose the same operative management (86% vs 70%, p = 0.046) if they had to choose again.
conclusionEarly reoperations within 6 months after ASD surgery that addresses the reason for the revision surgery do not adversely affect two-year functional and pain outcomes. However, only 70% would choose the same treatment again vs 86% of those who didn't undergo a reoperation with greater SRS22r total score MCID attainment among the No Reop cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40180792What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.