ArticlePharmaceutical research2025
Combining High-Throughput Screening and Machine Learning to Predict the Formation of Both Binary and Ternary Amorphous Solid Dispersion Formulations for Early Drug Discovery and Development.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative Model Enhanced X-ray Computed Tomography Imaging for Pharmaceutical Powder Microstructure Reconstruction and Evaluation.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Article
- Recent Techniques to Improve Amorphous Dispersion Performance with Quality Design, Physicochemical Monitoring, Molecular Simulation, and Machine Learning.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Ternary Solid Dispersions as an Alternative Approach to Enhance Pharmacological Activity.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAmorphous solid dispersion (ASD) is widely utilized to enhance the solubility and bioavailability of water-insoluble drugs. However, conventional experimental approaches for ASD development are often resource-intensive and time-consuming. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have great potential to predict ASD formulations but face the challenge of extensive data to construct reliable models. Current study aims to predict the formation of both binary and ternary ASD by combined high-throughput screening (HTS) and ML approaches.
methodsMicro-quantity HTS was conducted to generate 1272 binary and ternary solid dispersions using solvent evaporation method. The Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD) was used to characterize the amorphous state of formulations. The results indicated that 188 formulations successfully formed amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs), while 1084 resulted in crystalline formations. Models development employed nested cross-validation with four algorithms: Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP).
resultsThe RF model for ASD formation achieved 96.7% accuracy on the in-house HTS dataset, with a precision of approximately 87.9% and an F1 score of 83.6%. Furthermore, the RF model trained with milligram-scale HTS experimental data could effectively predict the large-scale ASD formulations from the literature, highlighting its promise as a powerful tool for advancing ASD prediction.
conclusionIn summary, the combination of HTS experiments and ML techniques provides a valuable reference framework for ASD development, greatly minimizing both time and material usage in the selection of formulations during the early stages of drug discovery with a limited quantity of API.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40180767What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.