Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40180759›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2025

Learning-Based Models for Predicting IVIG Resistance and Coronary Artery Lesions in Kawasaki Disease: A Review of Technical Aspects and Study Features.

Danilo Mirata, Anna Chiara Tiezzi, Lorenzo Buffoni, Ilaria Pagnini, Ilaria Maccora, Edoardo Marrani, Maria Vincenza Mastrolia, Gabriele Simonini, Teresa Giani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Danilo Mirata *Pediatric Department, School of Sciences of Human Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1302-8192
Anna Chiara Tiezzi *Pediatric Department, School of Sciences of Human Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1982-2987
Lorenzo BuffoniDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, School of Physical, Mathematical and Natural Sciences, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-3375
Ilaria PagniniRheumatology Unit, ERN ReCONNET Center, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Firenze, Italy.
Ilaria MaccoraRheumatology Unit, ERN ReCONNET Center, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Firenze, Italy.
Edoardo MarraniRheumatology Unit, ERN ReCONNET Center, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Firenze, Italy.
Maria Vincenza MastroliaRheumatology Unit, ERN ReCONNET Center, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Firenze, Italy.
Gabriele SimoniniRheumatology Unit, ERN ReCONNET Center, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Firenze, Italy.
Teresa GianiRheumatology Unit, ERN ReCONNET Center, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Firenze, Italy. teresa.giani@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9292-7601

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kawasaki disease (KD) is a common pediatric vasculitis, with coronary artery lesions (CALs) representing its most severe complication. Early identification of high-risk patients, including those with disease resistant to first-line treatments, is essential to guide personalized therapeutic approaches. Given the limited reliability of current scoring systems, there has been growing interest in the development of new prognostic models based on machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI). AI has the potential to revolutionize the management of KD by improving patient stratification and supporting more targeted treatment strategies. This narrative review examines recent applications of AI in stratifying patients with KD, with a particular focus on the ability of models to predict intravenous immunoglobulin resistance and the risk of CALs. We analyzed studies published between January 2019 and April 2024 that incorporated AI-based predictive models. In total, 21 papers met the inclusion criteria and were subject to technical and statistical review; 90% of these were conducted in patients from Asian hospitals. Most of the studies (18/21; 85.7%) were retrospective, and two-thirds included fewer than 1000 patients. Significant heterogeneity in study design and parameter selection was observed across the studies. Resistance to intravenous immunoglobulin emerged as a key factor in AI-based models for predicting CALs. Only five models demonstrated a sensitivity > 80%, and four studies provided access to the underlying algorithms and datasets. Challenges such as small sample sizes, class imbalance, and the need for multicenter validation currently limit the clinical applicability of machine-learning-based predictive models. The effectiveness of AI models is heavily influenced by the quantity and quality of data, labeling accuracy, and the completeness of the training datasets. Additionally, issues such as noise and missing data can negatively affect model performance and generalizability. These limitations highlight the need for rigorous validation and open access to model code to ensure transparency and reproducibility. Collaboration and data sharing will be essential for refining AI algorithms, improving patient stratification, and optimizing treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseImmunoglobulins, IntravenousMachine LearningMucocutaneous Lymph Node SyndromeAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceDrug ResistanceHumansImmunoglobulins, Intravenous

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.