ReviewPaediatric drugs2025
Learning-Based Models for Predicting IVIG Resistance and Coronary Artery Lesions in Kawasaki Disease: A Review of Technical Aspects and Study Features.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Autophagy-Inflammasome Axis as a Molecular Switch: From Persistent Inflammation to Vascular Remodeling in IVIG-Resistant Kawasaki Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- An interpretable machine learning model for early risk stratification of medium-to-giant coronary artery aneurysm in Kawasaki disease: development and external validation.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a novel interpretable machine learning model integrating immune-inflammatory indicators for intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting medium-to-giant coronary aneurysms in Kawasaki disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Immunophenotype of Kawasaki Disease: Insights into Pathogenesis and Treatment Response.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kawasaki disease (KD) is a common pediatric vasculitis, with coronary artery lesions (CALs) representing its most severe complication. Early identification of high-risk patients, including those with disease resistant to first-line treatments, is essential to guide personalized therapeutic approaches. Given the limited reliability of current scoring systems, there has been growing interest in the development of new prognostic models based on machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI). AI has the potential to revolutionize the management of KD by improving patient stratification and supporting more targeted treatment strategies. This narrative review examines recent applications of AI in stratifying patients with KD, with a particular focus on the ability of models to predict intravenous immunoglobulin resistance and the risk of CALs. We analyzed studies published between January 2019 and April 2024 that incorporated AI-based predictive models. In total, 21 papers met the inclusion criteria and were subject to technical and statistical review; 90% of these were conducted in patients from Asian hospitals. Most of the studies (18/21; 85.7%) were retrospective, and two-thirds included fewer than 1000 patients. Significant heterogeneity in study design and parameter selection was observed across the studies. Resistance to intravenous immunoglobulin emerged as a key factor in AI-based models for predicting CALs. Only five models demonstrated a sensitivity > 80%, and four studies provided access to the underlying algorithms and datasets. Challenges such as small sample sizes, class imbalance, and the need for multicenter validation currently limit the clinical applicability of machine-learning-based predictive models. The effectiveness of AI models is heavily influenced by the quantity and quality of data, labeling accuracy, and the completeness of the training datasets. Additionally, issues such as noise and missing data can negatively affect model performance and generalizability. These limitations highlight the need for rigorous validation and open access to model code to ensure transparency and reproducibility. Collaboration and data sharing will be essential for refining AI algorithms, improving patient stratification, and optimizing treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40180759What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.