Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40180705›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025

A Neural Network Model for Intelligent Classification of Distal Radius Fractures Using Statistical Shape Model Extraction Features.

Xing-Bo Cai, Ze-Hui Lu, Zhi Peng, Yong-Qing Xu, Jun-Shen Huang, Hao-Tian Luo, Yu Zhao, Zhong-Qi Lou, Zi-Qi Shen, Zhang-Cong Chen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Xing-Bo CaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Ze-Hui LuThe Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
Zhi PengDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yong-Qing XuDepartment of Orthopedics, 920th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, PLA, Kunming, China.
Jun-Shen HuangKey Lab of Statistical Modeling and Data Analysis of Yunnan, Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Hao-Tian LuoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yu ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhong-Qi LouDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Zi-Qi ShenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Zhang-Cong ChenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Xiong-Gang YangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Ying WuKey Lab of Statistical Modeling and Data Analysis of Yunnan, Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Sheng LuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2500-3926

Funding

Major Science and Technology Project of Yunnan Province Science and Technology Plan 202102AA310042Project of Yunnan Key Laboratory of Digital Orthopedics 202005AG070004Social Development Project of Science and Technology Department of Yunnan Province 202403AC100003Yunnan Medical Leading Talents Project L-2019006Yunnan Orthopedics and Sports Rehabilitation Clinical Medical Research Center 202102AA310068Yunnan Province "Ten Thousand People Plan" Famous Medical Project YNWR-MY-2019-058Yunnan Provincial Department of Science and Technology 202401AU070121Yunnan Spinal Cord Disease Clinical Medical Center ZX2022000101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDistal radius fractures account for 12%-17% of all fractures, with accurate classification being crucial for proper treatment planning. Studies have shown that in emergency settings, the misdiagnosis rate of hand/wrist fractures can reach up to 29%, particularly among non-specialist physicians due to a high workload and limited experience. While existing AI methods can detect fractures, they typically require large training datasets and are limited to fracture detection without type classification. Therefore, there is an urgent need for an efficient and accurate method that can both detect and classify different types of distal radius fractures. To develop and validate an intelligent classifier for distal radius fractures by combining a statistical shape model (SSM) with a neural network (NN) based on CT imaging data.

methodsFrom August 2022 to May 2023, a total of 80 CT scans were collected, including 43 normal radial bones and 37 distal radius fractures (17 Colles', 12 Barton's, and 8 Smith's fractures). We established the distal radius SSM by combining mean values with PCA (Principal Component Analysis) features and proposed six morphological indicators across four groups. The intelligent classifier (SSM + NN) was trained using SSM features as input data and different fracture types as output data. Four-fold cross-validations were performed to verify the classifier's robustness. The SSMs for both normal and fractured distal radius were successfully established based on CT data. Analysis of variance revealed significant differences in all six morphological indicators among groups (p < 0.001). The intelligent classifier achieved optimal performance when using the first 15 PCA-extracted features, with a cumulative variance contribution rate exceeding 75%. The classifier demonstrated excellent discrimination capability with a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95 in four-fold cross-validation, and achieved an overall classification accuracy of 97.5% in the test set. The optimal prediction threshold range was determined to be 0.2-0.4.

resultsThe SSMs for both normal and fractured distal radius were successfully established based on CT data. Analysis of variance revealed significant differences in all six morphological indicators among groups (p < 0.001). The intelligent classifier achieved optimal performance when using the first 15 PCA-extracted features, with a cumulative variance contribution rate exceeding 75%. The classifier demonstrated excellent discrimination capability with a mean AUC of 0.95 in four-fold cross-validation and achieved an overall classification accuracy of 97.5% in the test set. The optimal prediction threshold range was determined to be 0.2-0.4.

conclusionThe CT-based SSM + NN intelligent classifier demonstrated excellent performance in identifying and classifying different types of distal radius fractures. This novel approach provides an efficient, accurate, and automated tool for clinical fracture diagnosis, which could potentially improve diagnostic efficiency and treatment planning in orthopedic practice.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalNeural Networks, ComputerRadius FracturesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTomography, X-Ray ComputedWrist Fracturesartificial intelligencecomputer‐aided diagnosisdistal radius fractureprincipal component analysisstatistical shape model

Identifiers

PMID40180705
PMCPMC12050184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.