ReviewArchives of sexual behavior2025
Practice for Parturition: Does Sexual Activity Improve Labor and Birth Outcomes?
Review in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does the Quality of the Sexual Resolution Phase Influence Later Childbirth? A Comment on Dinsdale and Crespi (2025).Archives of sexual behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Niles Newton, a prolific reproductive biologist, described physical, psychological, and hormonal similarities between female sexual response and childbirth. Such phenotypic overlap indicates shared mechanisms, which led Newton to suggest that dysfunction in one process could interfere with the other process. There currently exists very little research on how pre-birth female sexuality impacts subsequent parturition. We address this knowledge gap and extend Newton's work by proposing that sexual activity provides opportunities for women to physically and psychologically prepare for childbirth, a process that we call "practice for parturition." To introduce and describe the practice for parturition framework, we provide a detailed review of salient reflexes of the female genito-pelvis, as well as psychological states that facilitate both sexual pleasure and parturition. These physical and psychological mechanisms represent putative links between sex and birth that underpin our prediction that sexual activity provides birth preparation for women. We demonstrate the utility of the practice for parturition framework through three systematic reviews, evaluating the following hypotheses: (1) Pelvic floor interventions jointly improve sexual function and birth outcomes; (2) the presence of pre-birth sexual activity and/or sexual function predicts improved labor and birth; and (3) the presence of sexual dysfunction impairs birth outcomes. Results from our review provide notable evidence supporting the three hypotheses, although there are little to no data directly linking female orgasm or arousal with parturition. We describe specific ideas for further tests of the practice for parturition hypothesis, its practical implications, and the relevance of sex-birth interrelationships to informing ongoing debates concerning the evolutionary biology of female orgasm and sexuality more broadly. The practice for parturition hypothesis provides an organizing and testable framework through which to investigate potential benefits of female sexuality on birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.