ArticleProtoplasma2025
Desiccation tolerance in peatland desmids: a comparative study of Micrasterias thomasiana and Staurastrum hirsutum (Zygnematophyceae).
Article in Protoplasma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Desmids are valuable bioindicators in peatland ecosystems due to their sensitivity to environmental changes. In temperate and boreal wetlands, seasonal desiccation of aquatic habitats, which is increasing in frequency and severity due to ongoing climate change, is currently considered a key factor structuring the distribution of individual taxa. In this study, the desiccation tolerance of Micrasterias thomasiana and Staurastrum hirsutum isolated from contrasting hydrological environments in the peatland habitats of the Ore Mountains, Czech Republic, is investigated. Using controlled experimental conditions, we subjected both young, actively growing and old, mature cultures to four different desiccation treatments and evaluated morphology and photosynthetic performance. Our results showed that young and old cultures of both species exhibited a very similar photophysiological response. Severe desiccation led to an irreversible decline in the effective quantum yield of photosystem II in both species, resulting in cell death. Mild drought stress allowed the cultures to recover, indicating that the stress severity determines the recovery potential. Finally, prolonged desiccation resulted in irreversible damage in older cultures of both species, emphasizing the limited desiccation resilience of desmids. We observed similarities in morphology with Zygnema "pre-akinetes," but in contrast to these resilient cells, the old cells of M. thomasiana and S. hirsutum did not survive the harsher desiccation conditions. Long-term mild desiccation revealed a higher resistance of S. hirsutum, probably due to the protective role of its dense mucilage. In nature, these two species usually inhabit localities with low desiccation risk or avoid and mitigate desiccation stress through localized survival strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.