ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Analysis on the treatment compliance of patients with androgenetic alopecia and its influencing factors: based on the comparison between microneedle therapy and drug therapy.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study is to analyze treatment adherence and its influencing factors in patients with androgenetic alopecia (AGA). Clinical data from 156 AGA patients, including 89 males and 67 females, were collected. The patients were assigned to either medication group (n = 86) or microneedling group (n = 70). Treatment adherence was assessed using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MGL). Additional data on the patients' basic information, annual income, education level, side effects, treatment efficacy, disease severity, and mental health (anxiety and depression) were also recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with treatment adherence. The results showed that patients in the microneedling group demonstrated significantly higher treatment adherence compared to those in the medication group (P = 0.032). Within the microneedling group, adherence was significantly associated with age, education level, annual income, treatment duration, and side effects (P < 0.05). Specifically, patients over the age of 30, those with higher incomes, higher educational levels, and those with treatment durations of less than 3 months exhibited better adherence. Additionally, both treatment efficacy improvement and reduced anxiety were strongly correlated with better adherence (P < 0.001, P = 0.010). In the medication group, side effects and treatment efficacy were significant factors influencing adherence (P = 0.001, P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that, within the microneedling group, patients with at least a middle school education or higher (OR = 0.031, P = 0.035; OR = 0.016, P = 0.041) and those who experienced improved treatment outcomes (OR = 0.002, P = 0.006) were more likely to adhere to treatment. On the other hand, the occurrence of side effects significantly increased the likelihood of non-adherence (OR = 92.358, P = 0.019). Patients with more severe conditions were more likely to adhere to treatment (OR = 0.035, P = 0.038). In the medication group, those with stable or improved treatment outcomes showed better adherence (OR = 0.004, P = 0.010; OR = 0.005, P = 0.012). However, patients with more severe conditions were more likely to discontinue treatment (OR = 204.058, P = 0.029), and depression was identified as a significant risk factor for non-adherence (OR = 586.074, P = 0.004). Microneedling therapy demonstrates significant advantages in improving patient adherence, particularly by reducing side effects, enhancing perceived treatment efficacy, and improving mental health. Treatment efficacy and side effects are key determinants of treatment adherence, with patient age, education level, and income also playing an important role. Future studies should further explore the long-term efficacy and safety of microneedling therapy across different patient populations to optimize treatment protocols and improve adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40180664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.