SynthesisThe American journal of clinical nutrition2025
High-dose docosahexaenoic acid for bronchopulmonary dysplasia severity in very preterm infants: a collaborative individual participant data meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05915806 (Enteral Supplementation With High-dose Docosahexaenoic Acid on the Risk for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Very Preterm Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enteral Supplementation With High-dose Docosahexaenoic Acid on the Risk for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Very Preterm Infants: A Collaborative Study Protocol for an Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DHA: Nutritional Programming During the First 1000 Days of Life.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeonatal supplementation with high-dose docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) omega-3 may benefit neurodevelopment in very preterm infants, but concerns remain regarding a potential increased risk and severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). However, the interpretation of evidence on the effect of DHA on severe BPD is challenging because of the heterogeneity in the BPD definitions used across trials.
objectivesThis study aims to determine whether, compared with placebo, neonatal enteral supplementation with high-dose DHA, mimicking placental transfer, is associated with severe BPD in very preterm infants using an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
methodsRCTs were eligible if recently conducted in infants born with gestational age (GA) <29 wk and compared enteral supplementation with high-dose DHA alone with a placebo. Using a harmonized data set, the primary outcome of severe BPD was defined as the need for "high-flow" nasal cannula >2 L/min, noninvasive positive airway pressure, or invasive mechanical ventilation at 36 wk postmenstrual age. Secondary outcomes (N = 15) included death, "death or severe BPD," ordinal BPD severity grade, and common neonatal morbidities. Associations between high-dose DHA and outcomes were estimated using a one-stage meta-analysis approach.
resultsTwo RCTs were identified in a systematic review (searched up to August 1, 2022; N = 2304) that met inclusion criteria (N = 1801; 904 DHA and 897 placebo; GA 26.7 ± 1.5 wk). Severe BPD in survivors occurred in 290/843 (34.4%) infants in the DHA group and 268/841 (31.9%) infants in the placebo group {relative risk [RR], 1.06 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93, 1.21]; P = 0.36}. DHA was not associated with "death or severe BPD" [RR, 1.05 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.17); P = 0.41], the ordinal severity grade [odds ratio for a more severe grade, 1.20 (95% CI: 0.998, 1.45); P = 0.053], or other neonatal outcomes. There was limited evidence of heterogeneity for BPD-related outcomes.
conclusionsNeonatal enteral supplementation with high-dose DHA was not significantly associated with severe BPD in very preterm infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05915806, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05915806. META-ANALYSIS REGISTRY NUMBER AND WEBSITE: PROSPERO, CRD42023431063, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=431063.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.