ArticleBMJ open2025
Co-designing implementation strategies for social prescribing in Lancashire and South Cumbria: a qualitative study with a participatory approach.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSocial Prescribing (SP) programmes hold significant promise, yet there is a critical need to identify the underlying causes of their challenges and develop evidence-based, co-designed solution ideas through a collaborative approach.
designThis study applied a multimethod participatory design using co-design workshops to generate solutions to root problems and a 2-day Citizen Jury (CJ) event to validate these solutions from different perspectives.
participantsFour co-design workshops were conducted with different stakeholders, including experts-by-experience, community providers, SP link workers and other health and social care professionals who were responsible in SP coordination and leadership. DATA ANALYSIS: Data were analysed using thematic analysis, identifying the root causes across several domains: human resources issues, social determinants of health), intrasectoral and intersectoral collaboration in health planning and service delivery, knowledge and awareness, financing, assessment systems for evaluating SP programme effectiveness, information systems and supportive policies/mechanisms.
results11 solutions were proposed, including prioritising a human-centric approach, establishing sustainable funding mechanisms, providing sufficient training and knowledge for staff, fostering co-production and shared vision across sectors, adopting a preventive approach to healthcare, enhancing information system support and encouraging self-referrals. These strategies were proposed and refined during the 2-day CJ event.
conclusionsUsing a participatory method enabled a comprehensive understanding of different stakeholders' perspectives and facilitated the development of co-produced solutions based on the identified challenges. This approach has the potential to assist policymakers in developing realistic policies to enhance social care within integrated care systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.