Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40180392›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Wise or wide (WoW) study protocol: a national, multicentre, prospective, randomised and controlled, parallel group, non-inferiority study to compare single-staged versus two-staged excisions of thin invasive (≤1.0 mm) melanoma.

Ebba Wennberg, Magdalena Claeson, Roger Olofsson Bagge, Sam Polesie, John Paoli

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06363591 (Wise vs Wide), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06363591 narecruitingnot on this map

Wise vs Wide: A National, Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized and Controlled, Parallel Group, Non-inferiority Study to Compare Single- vs Two-staged Excisions of Thin Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorVastra Gotaland RegionRan2025 to 2039Enrolled2,486ConditionsMelanomaArmsSurgery, No Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Wise or Wide? Rethinking Surgical Margins for Melanoma.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2026
    Article
  3. A Clinical Perspective on Melanoma Overdiagnosis.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ebba WennbergDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Magdalena ClaesonDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Roger Olofsson BaggeDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sam PolesieDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
John PaoliDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden john.paoli@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1326-8535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSweden has one of the highest incidence rates of cutaneous melanoma globally, and the incidence is rapidly increasing. Melanoma mortality is linked to the thickness of the primary tumour, with thicker melanomas having a poorer prognosis. Thin invasive melanomas (≤1.0 mm Breslow thickness) have excellent prognosis. Traditionally, the surgical approach for melanoma involves a two-step procedure of a diagnostic excision followed by a wide local excision (WLE) with 10 mm clinical margins. The WLE aims to remove potential microsatellites and residual melanoma, which in theory would prevent loco-regional recurrence and could improve survival. However, recent research questions the necessity of WLE for thin invasive melanomas, given their favourable prognosis, minimal risk of microsatellitosis and low rates of residual melanoma found in WLE tissue specimens. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial seeks to enrol 2486 patients with thin invasive melanomas that are completely excised with ≥1.5 mm histopathological margins following the diagnostic excision. Patients will be randomly assigned to either a control group that will undergo a WLE with 10 mm clinical margins according to current clinical routine or an experimental group without a WLE. The primary and secondary endpoints are recurrence-free survival at 5 and 10 years, respectively, with tertiary aims including postoperative complications, scar quality, patient satisfaction and quality of life, healthcare resource utilisation as well as differences in biomarkers of recurrent and non-recurrent melanomas. Patients will be assessed at clinical follow-up visits at 3 months as well as at 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval of this study was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2024-03274-01). The findings of the study will be presented at international scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed academic journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06363591.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMargins of ExcisionMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSwedenDERMATOLOGYRandomized Controlled TrialResearch DesignSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID40180392
PMCPMC11966995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.