ArticleBMJ open2025
Wise or wide (WoW) study protocol: a national, multicentre, prospective, randomised and controlled, parallel group, non-inferiority study to compare single-staged versus two-staged excisions of thin invasive (≤1.0 mm) melanoma.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06363591 (Wise vs Wide), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Wise vs Wide: A National, Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized and Controlled, Parallel Group, Non-inferiority Study to Compare Single- vs Two-staged Excisions of Thin Melanoma
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Narrow Excision Margins for Diverse Histological Subtypes of Cutaneous Melanoma in Children and Adults: A Systematic Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Wise or Wide? Rethinking Surgical Margins for Melanoma.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2026Article
- A Clinical Perspective on Melanoma Overdiagnosis.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2025Review
- The Frequency of Microsatellite Metastases, Satellite Metastases, and Residual Tumor in Thin Melanomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSweden has one of the highest incidence rates of cutaneous melanoma globally, and the incidence is rapidly increasing. Melanoma mortality is linked to the thickness of the primary tumour, with thicker melanomas having a poorer prognosis. Thin invasive melanomas (≤1.0 mm Breslow thickness) have excellent prognosis. Traditionally, the surgical approach for melanoma involves a two-step procedure of a diagnostic excision followed by a wide local excision (WLE) with 10 mm clinical margins. The WLE aims to remove potential microsatellites and residual melanoma, which in theory would prevent loco-regional recurrence and could improve survival. However, recent research questions the necessity of WLE for thin invasive melanomas, given their favourable prognosis, minimal risk of microsatellitosis and low rates of residual melanoma found in WLE tissue specimens. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial seeks to enrol 2486 patients with thin invasive melanomas that are completely excised with ≥1.5 mm histopathological margins following the diagnostic excision. Patients will be randomly assigned to either a control group that will undergo a WLE with 10 mm clinical margins according to current clinical routine or an experimental group without a WLE. The primary and secondary endpoints are recurrence-free survival at 5 and 10 years, respectively, with tertiary aims including postoperative complications, scar quality, patient satisfaction and quality of life, healthcare resource utilisation as well as differences in biomarkers of recurrent and non-recurrent melanomas. Patients will be assessed at clinical follow-up visits at 3 months as well as at 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval of this study was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2024-03274-01). The findings of the study will be presented at international scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed academic journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06363591.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.