Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40180390›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

International consensus-based core outcome set for airway management clinical trials and observational studies: the Airway Terminology and Outcome Measures (ATOM) protocol.

Jan Hansel, Alexander Fuchs, Gillian Radcliffe, Andreas Sotiriou, Kate Rivett, Vera Bohnenblust, Rosanna Grimes, Markus Fally, Robert Greif, Tim M Cook and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jan HanselThe University of Manchester, Manchester, UK jan.hansel@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2858-1313
Alexander FuchsDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7188-1683
Gillian RadcliffeLane Fox Unit / Sleep Disorders Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Andreas SotiriouDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kate RivettDifficult Airway Society, London, UK.
Vera BohnenblustInselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Rosanna GrimesDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Markus FallyDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kobenhavn, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1339-2918
Robert GreifFaculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Tim M CookRoyal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Bath, UK.
Kariem El BoghdadlyDepartment of Anaesthetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Airway Terminology and Outcome Measures (ATOM) Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAirway management describes a range of commonly performed procedures undertaken to enable invasive respiratory support for patients. Studies of airway management interventions report heterogeneous outcomes, impeding evidence synthesis and translation of findings into clinical practice. A core outcome set is a consensus-based standardised minimum collection of outcomes to be reported in a given area of healthcare. The Airway Terminology and Outcome Measures project aims to define a core outcome set and select outcome measurement instruments for future airway management research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Following a systematic literature search, we generated a list of candidate outcomes by extracting outcomes and their measurement instruments from a random sample of included studies until saturation was reached and no new outcomes emerged. The search resulted in a long list of 64 outcomes for inclusion in the consensus building stage. Key stakeholders, including patients, clinicians and researchers, will be invited to participate in a multiround modified Delphi process and a panel meeting to finalise the core outcome set and agree to their measurement instruments. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Health Research Authority and the London - Fulham Research Ethics Committee (24/LO/0544). All participants will provide informed consent. Study findings will be presented as conference proceedings and published in peer-reviewed medical journals. ESTIMATED START OF THIS STUDY: 20 November 2024 REGISTRATION NUMBER: COMET 3146.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementOutcome Assessment, Health CareTerminology as TopicClinical Trials as TopicConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansObservational Studies as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicResearch DesignACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEAdult anaesthesiaINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CAREPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProtocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID40180390
PMCPMC11969595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.