ArticleBMJ open2025
Development and validation of a Chinese general practitioners' ability to recognise and manage depression assessment scale: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThere is a shortage of reliable tools to evaluate general practitioners' (GPs) ability to recognise and manage depression. The main aim of this study was to develop and validate a reliable tool for assessing the GPs' ability to recognise and manage depression.
designA cross-sectional survey incorporating the GPs' ability to recognise and manage the depression assessment scale, the work was administered between July 2023 and June 2024. GPs' ability to recognise and manage the depression assessment scale was developed in four phases: (1) item pool construction, (2) expert consultation, (3) exploratory factor analysis for further item reduction and to identify the factor structure of the revised scale and (4) confirmatory factor analyses to confirm the factors identified within the exploratory factor analysis.
settingPrimary healthcare in China.
participantsA total of 421 GPs participated in the study across phases 3 and 4. Phase 3 included 172 GPs, and phase 4 involved 249 GPs. They had been working in primary healthcare, with 44.42% having more than 10 years of experience. Of the participants, 57% were female.
resultsThe GPs' ability to recognise and manage the depression assessment scale comprised two dimensions, with 24 items. Two factors explained 66.62% of the items' variance through exploratory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis
conclusionsThe newly developed scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing GPs' abilities to recognise and manage depression. It is suitable for large-scale surveys, particularly in underdeveloped regions, and can help identify gaps in knowledge. The scale results highlight areas where GPs' skills are lacking, enabling the design of targeted continuing education programmes. It can also assess the effectiveness of depression training courses, providing a foundation for tailored interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.