ArticleJournal of vascular surgery2025
Accuracy of posthospitalization stroke detection following carotid revascularization in Medicare claims.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking the impact of amaurosis with contemporary outcomes of carotid endarterectomy among patients with transient monocular blindness.Journal of vascular surgery · 2026Article
- Impact of the Medicare carotid stenting national coverage determination on procedure utilization and long-term stroke risk after carotid revascularization.Journal of vascular surgery · 2026Article
- Three-year risk of stroke after transcarotid artery revascularization versus carotid endarterectomy among Medicare beneficiaries.Journal of vascular surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStroke after carotid revascularization is a key effectiveness and quality metric relevant to patients, clinicians, and policymakers. To date, the accuracy of stroke rates reported from Medicare claims-based datasets for patients who underwent carotid revascularization remain unknown. The objective of this study was to validate the accuracy of using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes to detect stroke after carotid artery revascularization.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent carotid revascularization at two institutions from January 2016 to December 2019. We used a list of ICD-10 codes to detect stroke that we derived previously and validated in two prospective cohorts with atherosclerosis. We applied the list to all patients who underwent carotid revascularization at the two institutions to identify patients with an ICD-10 code for stroke, either as the indication for the index procedure or after the procedure. We then performed a comprehensive medical record review for all stroke patients, as well as a 1:1 random sample of patients who underwent revascularization during the same time interval and did not have an ICD-10 code for stroke. Our primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of the ICD-10 codes to detect posthospitalization stroke (ie, after the index hospitalization) compared with a gold standard of chart review.
resultsWe performed a comprehensive medical record review of a cohort oversampled for stroke that included 199 patients (mean age, 73.5±7.6 years; 62.3% male; 95.0% non-Hispanic White; 61.8% symptomatic) who underwent carotid revascularization during the study interval. The majority of patients underwent carotid endarterectomy (82.4%), followed by transcarotid artery revascularization (12.1%) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (5.5%). Twelve patients had a stroke during their index hospitalization, creating a final cohort of 187 patients eligible for assessment of posthospitalization stroke. After a median follow-up time of 453 days (interquartile range, 82-803 days), 10 asymptomatic patients and 10 symptomatic patients had a posthospitalization stroke based on chart review. Among asymptomatic patients, the sensitivity and specificity of ICD-10 codes to detect a posthospitalization stroke were 100% (95% CI, 69.2%-100.0%) and 96.8% (95% CI, 88.8%-99.6%), respectively, when considering all linked diagnosis codes. Among symptomatic patients, the sensitivity and specificity of ICD-10 codes to detect a posthospitalization stroke were 80.0% (95% CI, 44.4%-97.5%) and 94.3% (95% CI, 88.0%-97.9%), respectively, when considering all diagnosis codes.
conclusionsPosthospitalization stroke can be measured accurately after carotid revascularization using ICD-10 codes in Medicare claims data. The reliability of the algorithm is better among asymptomatic patients than symptomatic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.