Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40179887›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025

Bayesian causal graphical model for joint Mendelian randomization analysis of multiple exposures and outcomes.

Verena Zuber, Toinét Cronjé, Na Cai, Dipender Gill, Leonardo Bottolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Verena ZuberDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: v.zuber@imperial.ac.uk.
Toinét CronjéDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Na CaiHelmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany; Computational Health Centre, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany; School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Dipender GillDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Leonardo BottoloDepartment of Genomic Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; MRC Biostatistics Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: lb664@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current Mendelian randomization (MR) methods do not reflect complex relationships among multiple exposures and outcomes as is typical for real-life applications. We introduce MrDAG, a Bayesian causal graphical model for summary-level MR analysis to detect dependency relations within the exposures, the outcomes, and between them to improve causal effects estimation. MrDAG combines three causal inference strategies. It uses genetic variation as instrumental variables to account for unobserved confounders. It performs structure learning to detect and orientate the direction of the dependencies within the exposures and the outcomes. Finally, interventional calculus is employed to derive principled causal effect estimates. In MrDAG the directionality of the causal effects between the exposures and the outcomes is assumed known, i.e., the exposures can only be potential causes of the outcomes, and no reverse causation is allowed. In the simulation study, MrDAG outperforms recently proposed one-outcome-at-a-time and multi-response multi-variable Bayesian MR methods as well as causal graphical models under the constraint on edges' orientation from the exposures to the outcomes. MrDAG was motivated to unravel how lifestyle and behavioral exposures impact mental health. It highlights first, education and second, smoking as effective points of intervention given their important downstream effects on mental health. It also enables the identification of a novel path between smoking and the genetic liability to schizophrenia and cognition, demonstrating the complex pathways toward mental health. These insights would have been impossible to delineate without modeling the paths between multiple exposures and outcomes at once.

Indexed as

Mendelian Randomization AnalysisModels, GeneticBayes TheoremCausalityComputer SimulationHumansSchizophreniacausal graphical modelscausal inferenceinterventional calculusMendelian randomizationmental healthpsychiatric genetics

Identifiers

PMID40179887
PMCPMC12120189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.