Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40179880›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2025

Charge distribution and helicity tune the binding of septin's amphipathic helix domain to membranes.

Christopher J Edelmaier, Stephen J Klawa, S Mahsa Mofidi, Qunzhao Wang, Shreeya Bhonge, Ellysa J D Vogt, Brandy N Curtis, Wenzheng Shi, Sonya M Hanson, Daphne Klotsa and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Localization and function of septins are susceptible to epitope tagging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Christopher J EdelmaierDepartment of Applied Physical Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, New York City, New York.
Stephen J KlawaDepartment of Applied Physical Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
S Mahsa MofidiDepartment of Applied Physical Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, New York City, New York.
Qunzhao WangDepartment of Applied Physical Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Shreeya BhongeDepartment of Applied Physical Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Ellysa J D VogtCurriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Brandy N CurtisDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Wenzheng ShiDepartment of Applied Physical Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Sonya M HansonCenter for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, New York City, New York; Center for Computational Mathematics, Flatiron Institute, New York City, New York.
Daphne KlotsaDepartment of Applied Physical Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
M Gregory ForestDepartment of Applied Physical Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Mathematics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Amy S GladfelterDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Ronit FreemanDepartment of Applied Physical Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: ronitfree@email.unc.edu.
Ehssan NazockdastDepartment of Applied Physical Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: ehssan@email.unc.edu.

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amphipathic helices (AHs) are secondary structures that can facilitate binding of proteins to the membrane by folding into a helix with hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces that interact with the same surfaces in the lipid membrane. Septins are cytoskeletal proteins that preferentially bind to domains of micron-scale curvature on the cell membrane. Studies have shown that AH domains in septin are essential for curvature sensing. We present the first computational study of septin AH interactions with lipid bilayers. Using all-atom simulations and metadynamics-enhanced sampling, we study the effect of charge distribution at the flanking ends of septin AH on the energy for helical folding and its consequences on the binding configuration and affinity to the membrane. This is relevant to septins, since the net positive charge on the flanking C-terminal amino acids is a conserved property across several organisms. Simulations revealed that the energy barrier for folding in the neutral-capped AH is much larger than the charge-capped AH, leading to a small fraction of AH folding and integration to the membrane compared to a significantly folded configuration in the bound charge-capped AH. These observations are consistent with the binding measurements of synthetic AH constructs with variable helicity to lipid vesicles. Additionally, we examined an extended AH sequence including eight amino acids upstream and downstream of the AH to mimic the native protein. Again, simulations and experiments show that the extended peptide, with a net positive charge at C-terminus, adopts a strong helical configuration in solution, giving rise to a higher membrane affinity. Altogether, these results identify the energy cost for folding of AHs as a regulator of AH binding configuration and affinity and provide a basic template for parameterizing AH-membrane interactions as a starting point for the future multiscale simulations for septin-membrane interactions.

Indexed as

Cell MembraneSeptinsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLipid BilayersMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein DomainsProtein Structure, SecondaryThermodynamicsLipid BilayersSeptins

Identifiers

PMID40179880
PMCPMC12044399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.