ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Patient Factors Associated With the Use of Online Portal Health Information in the Postpandemic Era: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a National Survey.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Financial Incentives on Electronic Health Record-Driven Recruitment of Underrepresented Communities in Research: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Patient Portal Activation Disparities by Ward, Census Tract, and Zip Code in an Urban Landscape Among Neurology Patients: Cross-Sectional Multi-Scale Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Social Determinants of Digital Health Intervention Use in China: National Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Patient Viewing and Comprehension of Immediately Released Test Results.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Patient Portal Use Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026Article
- More Older Adults Try Patient Portals in Recent Years, but Many Don't Continue: A Meta-Analysis.Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026Article
- Reliability of Electronic Medical Record to Assess Patient's Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening: Analysis of Two Pilot Trials.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2025Article
- Advice for Improving the Experience of Web-Based Patient Portals: Qualitative Interviews With Caregiver-Adolescent Dyads.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2025Article
- Patient Portal Use and Cancer Screening in the United States: Individual Associations and Population Impact.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients' electronic access to their health information can improve long-term health outcomes. Few studies have evaluated barriers that may limit access to portal health information before the COVID-19 pandemic such as preference for in-person visits, lack of perceived need to use a patient portal system, and lack of comfort or experience with computers. With the increased use of telehealth during the pandemic, patients' comfort with portal applications and digital health literacy has improved.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of portal use and factors associated with patients' portal access after the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsThis study used data from the 2022 National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6). Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who responded to the survey question about patient portal access were included. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine characteristics associated with portal access.
resultsA total number of 5958 patients were included (weighted n=245,721,106), with a mean age of 48.2 (20.1) years and were mostly female (119,538,392/236,138,857, 50.6%) and white (167,163,482/227,232,636, 73.6%). Overall, 61.3% (150,722,178/245,721,106) of all respondents reported accessing portals over the last 12 months and 43.7% (82,620,907/188,860,031) used multiple portals. Most participants (135,011,661/150,104,795, 89.9%) reported using portals to access test results, followed by viewing clinical notes (104,541,142/149,867,276, 69.8%) downloading personal health information (47,801,548/150,017,130, 31.9%). The likelihood of portal use significantly increased by 24.9% points (95% CI 19.4-30.5) when patients were offered access to portals by health care providers or insurers compared with those not offered access or did not know if they were offered access. The likelihood of portal use also increased by 19.5% points (95% CI 15.1-23.9) among patients with a health care provider encouraging them to access portals, compared to patients who did not receive encouragement to do so. Having a college education versus education below college level and living in metropolitan areas versus nonmetropolitan regions increased the probability of portal use by 6.9% points (95% CI 3.1-10.8) and 6.9% points (95% CI 1.3-12.6), respectively. Of note, males (compared with females) and those of Hispanic background (compared with non-Hispanic individuals) were less likely to be offered portal access by 10.8% points (95% CI 6.3-15.2) and 6.9% points (95% CI 1.7-12.1), respectively.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that most Americans use patient portals, though certain patient populations such as those with less than college degree education or living in nonmetropolitan areas continue to face greater difficulty accessing them. Interventions targeted at equality in offering access to patient portals and encouraging patients to use them could advance equitable and widespread access to patient portals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.