Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40179383›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Improving Early Dementia Detection Among Diverse Older Adults With Cognitive Concerns With the 5-Cog Paradigm: Protocol for a Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Clinical Trial.

Rachel Beth Rosansky Chalmer, Emmeline Ayers, Erica F Weiss, Nicole R Fowler, Andrew Telzak, Diana Summanwar, Jessica Zwerling, Cuiling Wang, Huiping Xu, Richard J Holden and 13 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05515224 (5-Cog Paradigm to Improve Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05515224 narecruitingnot on this map

5-Cog Paradigm to Improve Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care: Pragmatic Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlbert Einstein College of MedicineRan2023 to 2027Enrolled6,600ConditionsDementia, Cognitive ImpairmentArms5-Cog Paradigm (5-Cog battery coupled with clinical decision tool), Enhanced usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Rachel Beth Rosansky ChalmerDepartment of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6394-6539
Emmeline AyersDepartment of Neurology, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5061-3708
Erica F WeissDepartment of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0726-7547
Nicole R FowlerDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6465-0008
Andrew TelzakDepartment of Family and Social Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1695-9809
Diana SummanwarDepartment of Family Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7529-3632
Jessica ZwerlingDepartment of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3286-3225
Cuiling WangDepartment of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1399-1048
Huiping XuDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4025-6401
Richard J HoldenDepartment of Health & Wellness Design, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3603-6158
Kevin FioriDivision of Community and Population Health, Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1370-7366
Dustin D FrenchDepartments of Ophthalmology and Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4064-3206
Celeste NsubayiDepartment of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-4929-6670
Asif AnsariDepartment of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-6176-615X
Paul DexterDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0399-0156
Anna HigbieRegenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-6066-0402
Pratibha YadavDepartment of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9769-0033
James M WalkerDepartments of Ophthalmology and Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9661-6322
Harrshavasan CongivaramDepartments of Ophthalmology and Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-5897-0560
Dristi AdhikariDepartment of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4289-1329
Mairim Melecio-VazquezDepartment of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-1060-3760
Malaz BoustaniDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0330-677X
Joe VergheseDepartment of Neurology, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4252-2547

Funding

Einstein-Montefiore Clinical and Translational Science Award HubUM1TR004400 · NCATS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Jessica Kahn, Mimi Y Kim · 2023 to 2026
$17.3M
5-Cog Paradigm to Improve Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care: Pragmatic Clinical TrialU01NS105565 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI MALAZ BOUSTANI, JOE VERGHESE · 2022 to 2026
$6.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004400NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS105565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 5-Cog paradigm is a 5-minute brief cognitive assessment coupled with a clinical decision support tool designed to improve clinicians' early detection of cognitive impairment, including dementia, in their diverse older primary care patients. The 5-Cog battery uses picture- and symbol-based assessments and a questionnaire. It is low cost, simple, minimizes literacy bias, and is culturally fair. The decision support component of the paradigm helps nudge appropriate care provider response to an abnormal 5-Cog battery.

objectiveThe objective of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness, implementation, and cost of the 5-Cog paradigm.

methodsWe will enroll 6600 older patients with cognitive concerns from 22 primary care clinics in the Bronx, New York, and in multiple locations in Indiana for this hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial. We will analyze the effectiveness of the 5-Cog paradigm to increase the rate of new diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment syndrome or dementia using a pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial design. The secondary outcome is the ordering of new tests, treatments, and referrals for cognitive indications within 90 days after the study visit. The 5-Cog's decision support component will be deployed as an electronic medical record feature. We will analyze the 5-Cog's implementation process, context, and outcomes through the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research using a mixed methods design (surveys and interviews). The study will also examine cost-effectiveness from societal and payer (Medicare) perspectives by estimating the cost per additional dementia diagnosis.

resultsThe study is funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health (2U01NS105565). The protocol was approved by the Albert Einstein College of Medicine Institutional Review Board in September 2022. A validation study was completed to select cut scores for the 5-Cog battery. Among the 76 patients enrolled, the resulting clinical diagnoses were as follows: dementia in 32 (42%); mild cognitive impairment in 28 (37%); subjective cognitive concerns without objective cognitive impairment in 12 (16%); no cognitive diagnosis assigned in 2 (3%). The mean scores were Picture-Based Memory Impairment Screen 5.8 (SD 2.7), Symbol Match 27.2 (SD 18.2), and Subjective Motoric Cognitive Risk 2.4 (SD 1.7). The cut scores for an abnormal or positive result on the 5-Cog components were as follows: Picture-Based Memory Impairment Screen ≤6 (range 0-8), Symbol Match ≤25 (range 0-65), and Subjective Motoric Cognitive Risk >5 (range 0-7). As of December 2024, a total of 12 clinics had completed the onboarding processes, and 2369 patients had been enrolled.

conclusionsThe findings of this study will facilitate the rapid adaptation and dissemination of this effective and practical clinical tool across diverse primary care clinical settings.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05515224; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05515224. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/60471.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaAgedAged, 80 and overDecision Support Systems, ClinicalEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansIndianaMaleNeuropsychological TestsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPrimary Health Careclinical trial protocolcognitive assessmentcognitive impairmentcognitive screeningdementiadissemination and implementation sciencehybrid implementation-effectiveness trialmild cognitive impairmentrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID40179383
PMCPMC12006775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.