ArticleJMIR human factors2025
User-Centered Design of an Electronic Dashboard for Monitoring Facility-Level Basic Emergency Obstetric Care Readiness in Amhara, Ethiopia: Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMaternal mortality remains a persistent public health concern in sub-Saharan African countries such as Ethiopia. Health information technology solutions are a flexible and low-cost method for improving health outcomes with proven benefits in low- to middle-income countries' health systems.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and assess the usability of an electronic dashboard to monitor facility-level readiness to manage basic emergency obstetric care (BEmOC) in Amhara, Ethiopia.
methodsThe study used three methods to iteratively refine the dashboard: (1) user-centered design sessions with individuals who interact with the BEmOC supply chain, (2) review and feedback from domain and information visualization subject matter experts (SMEs) to refine the dashboard, and (3) usability heuristic evaluation with human-computer interaction (HCI) SMEs.
resultsUser-centered design sessions resulted in a preliminary version of the dashboard informed by end-user preferences and perceptions, with recommendations focusing on aesthetic design, filtering and sorting, and matching with the real world. An example of an end-user recommendation included increasing font sizes on the dashboard and using a red, yellow, and green color-coding scheme. Next, domain and visualization SMEs continued the dashboard's iterative refinement, focusing on aesthetic design and navigation, by confirming design choices incorporated from the user-centered design sessions and recommending changes to enhance user experience moving through the dashboard, such as adding more filtering options. HCI SMEs rated the dashboard as highly usable (0.82 on a scale of 0-4, with 0 being no usability concern and 4 being a catastrophic usability concern). The principle with the highest usability severity scores was a match between the system and the real world with a score of 1.4. The HCI SMEs also rated the information visualization aspects of the dashboard favorably with 2 usability principles, spatial organization and information coding, scoring 0.
conclusionsDashboards are a novel method for promoting and tracking facility capacity to manage BEmOC. By including targeted end users and SMEs in the design process, the team was able to tailor the dashboard to meet user needs, fit it into the existing government health systems, and ensure that the dashboard follows design best practices. Collectively, the novel, customized BEmOC dashboard can be used to track and improve facility-level readiness in Amhara, Ethiopia, and similar global BEmOC facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.