ReviewWork (Reading, Mass.)2025
The relationship between attachment and mental health at work: A narrative review.
Review in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of leadership in shaping psychological safety: a qualitative study from Slovakia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundWell-being at work is a critical concern, with a significant portion of the workforce reporting adverse mental health impacts due to work-related stress.ObjectiveThis narrative review explores the relationship between attachment theory and work-related mental health, focusing on how attachment influences employee experiences and outcomes.MethodsA literature search across databases, including PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar, was conducted, emphasizing empirical studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.ResultsThe literature suggests that secure attachment leads to better emotional regulation, lower stress, and higher job satisfaction. Conversely, insecure attachment contributes to increased burnout, emotional distress, and lower job performance. Supportive leader-follower relationships can mitigate the adverse effects of insecure attachment by providing a secure base for employees. The review also highlights the importance of considering attachment strategies within the context of diversity and systemic challenges and recognizes that survival mechanisms in one context can be unfairly viewed as maladaptive in another.ConclusionsEnhancing secure attachment through supportive leadership and organizational practices can promote better mental health outcomes and overall workplace well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.