Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40179153›Full record

ReviewWork (Reading, Mass.)2025

The relationship between attachment and mental health at work: A narrative review.

Devon McConnell, Geoff Wong, Anne Ferrey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Devon McConnellNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5519-0479
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5384-4157
Anne FerreyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5644-2735

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundWell-being at work is a critical concern, with a significant portion of the workforce reporting adverse mental health impacts due to work-related stress.ObjectiveThis narrative review explores the relationship between attachment theory and work-related mental health, focusing on how attachment influences employee experiences and outcomes.MethodsA literature search across databases, including PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar, was conducted, emphasizing empirical studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.ResultsThe literature suggests that secure attachment leads to better emotional regulation, lower stress, and higher job satisfaction. Conversely, insecure attachment contributes to increased burnout, emotional distress, and lower job performance. Supportive leader-follower relationships can mitigate the adverse effects of insecure attachment by providing a secure base for employees. The review also highlights the importance of considering attachment strategies within the context of diversity and systemic challenges and recognizes that survival mechanisms in one context can be unfairly viewed as maladaptive in another.ConclusionsEnhancing secure attachment through supportive leadership and organizational practices can promote better mental health outcomes and overall workplace well-being.

Indexed as

Mental HealthObject AttachmentWorkplaceBurnout, ProfessionalHumansJob SatisfactionOccupational Stressanxietyburnout (psychological)employee well-beingleadershipoccupational healthstress (psychological)work performance

Identifiers

PMID40179153
PMCPMC13018252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.