Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40179114›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Machine learning for automated electrical penetration graph analysis of aphid feeding behavior: Accelerating research on insect-plant interactions.

Quang Dung Dinh, Daniel Kunk, Truong Son Hy, Vamsi Nalam, Phuong D Dao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Quang Dung DinhInstitut Galilée, Universite Sorbonne Paris Nord, Villetaneuse, Paris, France.
Daniel KunkDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Truong Son HyDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5092-3757
Vamsi NalamDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6472-118X
Phuong D DaoDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electrical penetration graph (EPG) is a well-known technique that provides insights into the feeding behavior of insects with piercing-sucking mouthparts, mostly hemipterans. Since its inception in the 1960s, EPG has become indispensable in studying plant-insect interactions, revealing critical information about host plant selection, plant resistance, virus transmission, and responses to environmental factors. By integrating the plant and insect into an electrical circuit, EPG allows researchers to identify specific feeding behaviors based on their distinctive waveform patterns. However, the traditional manual analysis of EPG waveform data is time-consuming and labor-intensive, limiting research throughput. This study presents a novel Machine Learning (ML) approach to automate the annotation of EPG signals. We rigorously evaluated six diverse ML models, including neural networks, tree-based models, and logistic regression, using an extensive dataset from multiple aphid feeding experiments. Our results demonstrate that a Residual Network (ResNet) architecture achieved the highest overall waveform classification accuracy of 96.8% and highest segmentation overlap rate of 84.4%, highlighting the potential of ML for accurate and efficient EPG analysis. This automated approach promises to accelerate research in this field significantly and broaden insights into insect-plant interactions, showcasing the power of computational techniques for insect biological research. The source code for all experiments conducted within this study is publicly available at https://github.com/HySonLab/ML4Insects.

Indexed as

AphidsFeeding BehaviorMachine LearningPlantsAnimalsNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40179114
PMCPMC11967943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.