ArticlePloS one2025
RETRACTED: Advancing enterprise risk management with deep learning: A predictive approach using the XGBoost-CNN-BiLSTM model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-02-23Compromised Peer Review · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enterprise risk management is a key element to ensure the sustainable and steady development of enterprises. However, traditional risk management methods have certain limitations when facing complex market environments and diverse risk events. This study introduces a deep learning-based risk management model utilizing the XGBoost-CNN-BiLSTM framework to enhance the prediction and detection of risk events. This model combines the structured data processing capabilities of XGBoost, the feature extraction capabilities of CNN, and the time series processing capabilities of BiLSTM to more comprehensively capture the key characteristics of risk events. Through experimental verification on multiple data sets, our model has achieved significant advantages in key indicators such as accuracy, recall, F1 score, and AUC. For example, on the S&P 500 historical data set, our model achieved a precision rate of 93.84% and a recall rate of 95.75%, further verifying its effectiveness in predicting risk events. These experimental results fully demonstrate the robustness and superiority of our model. Our research is of great significance, not only providing a more reliable risk management method for enterprises, but also providing useful inspiration for the application of deep learning in the field of risk management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.