ReviewThe journal of physical chemistry letters2025
Advancing Molecular Simulations: Merging Physical Models, Experiments, and AI to Tackle Multiscale Complexity.
Review in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Physics-Experiment Trinity for Integrated Protein Dynamics Modeling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- AI-driven multiscale virtual plant cell modeling: from molecular mechanisms to tissue functions.Planta · 2026Review
- Structural quality-tier assessment for TCR-pMHC functional enrichment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Emerging Technologies and Integrated Interdisciplinary Strategies for Mitigating Protein Aggregation in Therapeutic Formulations.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Review
- Ligand binding Pro-miscuity of acylpeptide hydrolase, structural analysis of a detoxifying serine hydrolase.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteins and protein complexes form adaptable networks that regulate essential biochemical pathways and define cell phenotypes through dynamic mechanisms and interactions. Advances in structural biology and molecular simulations have revealed how protein systems respond to changes in their environments, such as ligand binding, stress conditions, or perturbations like mutations and post-translational modifications, influencing signal transduction and cellular phenotypes. Here, we discuss how computational approaches, ranging from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to AI-driven methods, are instrumental in studying protein dynamics from isolated molecules to large assemblies. These techniques elucidate conformational landscapes, ligand-binding mechanisms, and protein-protein interactions and are starting to support the construction of multiscale realistic representations of highly complex systems, ranging up to whole cell models. With cryo-electron microscopy, cryo-electron tomography, and AlphaFold accelerating the structural characterization of protein networks, we suggest that integrating AI and Machine Learning with multiscale MD methods will enhance fundamental understating for systems of ever-increasing complexity, usher in exciting possibilities for predictive modeling of the behavior of cell compartments or even whole cells. These advances are indeed transforming biophysics and chemical biology, offering new opportunities to study biomolecular mechanisms at atomic resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.