Observational studyPloS one2025
Characteristics of Dutch ED patients and their journey through the acute care chain: A province-wide flash-mob study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06079099 (Time Within the Acute Care Chain), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Time Within the Acute Care Chain: How Long Have Medical Emergency Department Patients Spent
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Physician Agreement on Diagnosis in the ED, Part of Diagnostic Excellence. A Prospective Multicenter Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- Utilization of acute medical services in general practice: a retrospective routine data analysis.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInsight in characteristics and journey of patients in the Acute Care Chain (ACC) who visit the Emergency Department (ED) is lacking. Existing studies focus on prespecified (time-sensitive) complex conditions like major trauma and stroke, and on the hospital phase. This study provides a representative overview of adult ED patients and their journey through the ACC with focus on differences between those with and without prespecified complex conditions.
methodsA prospective 72-hour flash-mob study was conducted in 2022 across all six EDs in the province of Limburg, the Netherlands, encompassing unselected adult patients. Baseline characteristics, journey, and time within ACC were collected. Patients with a prespecified complex condition (stroke, myocardial infarction, aortic syndrome and major trauma) were compared to those without.
resultsOut of 794 adult ED patients, 585 (73.7%) were included. Patients reported symptoms for a median of 1 day (IQR 0-4) before their ED visit; 56.3% encountered ≥ 1 healthcare provider. General practitioners referred 56.1% of patients, and emergency medical services transported 32.9%. The median time in ACC was 5.0 hours (IQR 3.5-6.9), with 3.0 hours (IQR 2.0-4.2) spent in the ED. The three most prevalent presenting complaints were minor trauma (28.5%), abdominal pain (14.6%) and dyspnoea (12.5%), while 9.3% presented with prespecified complex conditions. Patients with a prespecified complex condition were more often triaged highly urgent (53.6% vs 13.9%, p < 0.001) and received a complex work-up (79.6% vs 41.2%, p < 0.001).
conclusionIn our province-wide study, ED patients had symptoms for 1 day and over half of them already contacted a healthcare provider. Time in ACC was 5 hours, with a substantial proportion of time spent prehospitally. Prespecified complex conditions accounted for less than 1 in 10 ED patients. These findings highlight that, to optimise care and care policy, it is essential to examine the entire ACC for unselected patients.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06079099.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.