Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40179017›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2025

Evaluating the Lidocaine's Initial Dosing in Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and Heart Failure Admitted in Intensive Care Units.

Kazuhiko Kido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kazuhiko KidoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3393-8025

Funding

The author received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLidocaine is an antiarrhythmic with narrow therapeutic window indicated for refractory ventricular arrhythmia. Limited guidance is available regarding the initial infusion rate ranging from 1 to 4 mg/min in patients with heart failure (HF).

objectivesThe primary objective was to assess the optimal initial dosing of lidocaine therapy in patients with HF and ventricular arrhythmia.

methodsThe retrospective cohort study was performed to include patients aged 18 years or older with past medical history of HF or new onset HF who developed ventricular arrythmia requiring lidocaine therapy in cardiovascular intensive care units. The primary outcome was lidocaine levels within the therapeutic ranges (defined as 1.5 to 5.0 μg/L). The study also described the predictive performance of lidocaine one compartment PK model using correlation efficient between the population PK model-predicted levels and observed levels.

resultsA total of 56 patients with HF and ventricular arrhythmia was included. The mean lidocaine maintenance dose was 1.1 ± 0.5 mg/min. The median (IQR) lidocaine level was 3.1 (2.3, 4.1) μg/L. The probabilities within therapeutic, supratherapeutic, and subtherapeutic ranges were 66.1%, 19.6%, and 14.3%, respectively in the whole cohort. Predicted lidocaine levels with one compartment PK model were not correlated with observed lidocaine levels (R

conclusionLidocaine initial infusion rate should be up to 1 mg/min in patients with HF and ventricular arrhythmia.

Indexed as

Anti-Arrhythmia AgentsArrhythmias, CardiacHeart FailureIntensive Care UnitsLidocaineTachycardia, VentricularAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsLidocainecardiogenic shockheart failurelidocainepharmacokineticstherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40179017
PMCPMC11967443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.