ArticleCell transplantation
Administration Strategy-Dependent Mechanisms and Effects of Human Adipose Tissue Stem Cell Extracellular Vesicles in Mouse Allergic Rhinitis Treatment.
Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoparticle-Based Targeted Drug Delivery Systems for Allergic Rhinitis: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Multiple tail vein injections of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate allergic rhinitis in mice: superior efficacy of prolonged regimens.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We previously found that intravenous injection of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from human adipose tissue-derived stem cells (hADSC) could ameliorate allergic rhinitis (AR) in mice through immunomodulatory effects. In clinical trials, nasal delivery has been an attractive treatment for AR. We sought to determine whether there are differences in the therapeutic effects between caudal injection and their combination. We treated AR mice with ADSC-EVs via caudal vein, nasal cavity, or both. After treatment, the mice were re-sensitized and the indices of behavior, nasal mucosa morphology, and cytokine secretion of the mice under different modes of administration were calculated. The resultes show that tail vein, nasal, and combined administration could effectively relieve the inflammatory infiltration of the nasal mucosa of mice, reduce the secretion of IgE, IL-4, and other inflammatory factors, and alleviate the Th1/Th2 imbalance. Injection and nasal delivery, as well as their combination, effectively alleviated the symptoms of rhinitis in mice. Nasal administration has a better therapeutic effect when the inflammatory response is mild. It could be speculated that ADSC-EVs have excellent properties in the treatment of AR, and modes of administration can be selected for different stages of treatment in clinical therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.