ReviewNuclear medicine communications2025
A review of the association between baseline [ 18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and axillary pathological complete response in node-positive breast cancer patients: focus on clinical subtypes.
Review in Nuclear medicine communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of PET/CT-Derived Metabolic Parameters with Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer: An Analysis Across Molecular Subtypes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A dynamic nomogram for predicting axillary pathological complete response and its prognostic value in HER2-positive breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Value of early metabolic response for predicting axillary pathological complete response during neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple negative and HER2-amplified breast cancers: impact of tumor subtypes.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective is to assess whether the degree of metabolic uptake of the primary tumor and axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) on baseline [ 18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose ([ 18 F]FDG) PET/CT is associated with the probability to achieve axillary pathologic complete response (pCR) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), overall and per clinical subtype. Studies that assessed the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in the primary tumor and ALNs on baseline [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT and reported axillary pCR rates in patients diagnosed with cN+ invasive breast cancer treated with NST, followed by surgery, were searched. Area under the curve (AUC) values were obtained. A total of seven studies (561 patients) were included. The mean baseline SUVmax of the primary tumor ranged from 8.1 (±4.3) to 9.8 (±7.2). Mean baseline axillary SUVmax ranged from 6.0 (±5.6) to 7.3 (±6.2). The axillary pCR rate ranged from 38.0% to 48.1%. Considering the primary tumor, no study reported on the association between baseline SUVmax and the axillary pCR rate. Considering the ALNs, the AUC value for baseline axillary SUVmax to predict axillary pCR ranged from 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39-0.65; all subtypes included] to 0.74 (95% CI: 0.53-0.95; only human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ and triple negative). In conclusion, no association between the primary tumor SUVmax on baseline [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT and axillary pCR was found. Concerning the axilla, based on limited scientific evidence, the axillary SUVmax on baseline [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT may be associated with axillary pCR after NST in cN+ breast cancer patients, however, potential differences between clinical subtypes should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.