ReviewRespiratory care2025
Artificial Intelligence for the Detection of Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony.
Review in Respiratory care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic Detection of Onset and Offset of Respiratory Electromyographic Activity in Severe COPD Patients on Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2026Article
- Monitoring of invasive assisted mechanical ventilation: a good clinical practice document by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care (SIAARTI).Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Review
- Can we predict the future of respiratory failure prediction?Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in acute respiratory distress syndrome management: recent advances.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a challenge to invasive mechanical ventilation characterized by misalignment of ventilatory support and patient respiratory effort. PVA is highly prevalent and associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including increased work of breathing, oxygen consumption, and risk of barotrauma. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a potentially transformative solution offering capabilities for automated detection of PVA. This narrative review characterizes the landscape of AI models designed for PVA detection and quantification. A comprehensive literature search identified 13 studies, spanning diverse settings and patient populations. Machine learning (ML) techniques, derivation datasets, types of asynchronies detected, and performance metrics were assessed to provide a contemporary view of AI in this domain. We reviewed 166 articles published between 1989 and April 2024, of which 13 were included, encompassing 332 participants and analyzing >5.8 million breaths. Patient counts ranged between 8 and 107 and breath data ranged between 1,375 and 4.2 M. The reason for invasive mechanical ventilation use was given as ARDS in three articles, whereas the remainder had different invasive mechanical ventilation indications. Various ML methods as well as newer deep learning techniques were used to address PVA types. Sensitivity and specificity of 10 of the 13 models were >0.9, and 8 models reported accuracy of >0.9. AI models have significant potential to address PVA in invasive mechanical ventilation, displaying high accuracy across various populations and asynchrony types. This showcases their potential to accurately detect and quantify PVA. Future work should focus on model validation in diverse clinical settings and patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.