Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40178919›Full record

ReviewRespiratory care2025

Artificial Intelligence for the Detection of Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony.

Abdulhakim Tlimat, Cosmo Fowler, Sami Safadi, Robert B Johnson, Sandeep Bodduluri, Peter Morris, Surya P Bhatt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdulhakim TlimatDrs. Tlimat, Bodduluri, Morris, and Bhatt are affiliated with the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Cosmo FowlerDr. Fowler is affiliated with the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sami SafadiDr. Safadi is affiliated with the Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Robert B JohnsonMr. Johnson is affiliated with the Respiratory Therapy Department, The University of Alabama Medical Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Sandeep BodduluriDrs. Tlimat, Bodduluri, Morris, and Bhatt are affiliated with the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Peter MorrisDrs. Tlimat, Bodduluri, Morris, and Bhatt are affiliated with the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Surya P BhattDrs. Tlimat, Bodduluri, Morris, and Bhatt are affiliated with the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

Funding

Training Program in Lung Biology and Translational MedicineT32HL105346 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GAGGAR, AMIT · 2010 to 2025
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL105346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a challenge to invasive mechanical ventilation characterized by misalignment of ventilatory support and patient respiratory effort. PVA is highly prevalent and associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including increased work of breathing, oxygen consumption, and risk of barotrauma. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a potentially transformative solution offering capabilities for automated detection of PVA. This narrative review characterizes the landscape of AI models designed for PVA detection and quantification. A comprehensive literature search identified 13 studies, spanning diverse settings and patient populations. Machine learning (ML) techniques, derivation datasets, types of asynchronies detected, and performance metrics were assessed to provide a contemporary view of AI in this domain. We reviewed 166 articles published between 1989 and April 2024, of which 13 were included, encompassing 332 participants and analyzing >5.8 million breaths. Patient counts ranged between 8 and 107 and breath data ranged between 1,375 and 4.2 M. The reason for invasive mechanical ventilation use was given as ARDS in three articles, whereas the remainder had different invasive mechanical ventilation indications. Various ML methods as well as newer deep learning techniques were used to address PVA types. Sensitivity and specificity of 10 of the 13 models were >0.9, and 8 models reported accuracy of >0.9. AI models have significant potential to address PVA in invasive mechanical ventilation, displaying high accuracy across various populations and asynchrony types. This showcases their potential to accurately detect and quantify PVA. Future work should focus on model validation in diverse clinical settings and patient populations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRespiration, ArtificialHumansMachine LearningPatient-Ventilator AsynchronyVentilators, Mechanicalartificial intelligencePatient ventilator asynchronypredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID40178919
PMCPMC12369843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.