Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40178857›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Medicare Beneficiary Receipt of Methadone by Drive Time to Opioid Treatment Programs.

Jonathan Cantor, Helin G Hernandez, Aaron Kofner, Julie Lai, Denis Agniel, Kosali I Simon, Bradley D Stein, Erin A Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Retention among Medicaid beneficiaries in opioid treatment programs in California.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jonathan CantorRAND, Santa Monica, California.
Helin G HernandezRAND, Santa Monica, California.
Aaron KofnerRAND, Arlington, Virginia.
Julie LaiRAND, Santa Monica, California.
Denis AgnielRAND, Santa Monica, California.
Kosali I SimonO'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Bradley D SteinRAND, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Erin A TaylorRAND, Santa Monica, California.

Funding

Specialty Provider Prescribing of Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder in Older AdultsR21AG071925 · NIA · RAND CORPORATION · PI CANTOR, JONATHAN, TAYLOR, ERIN A · 2022 to 2023
$522k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG071925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: To combat the ongoing opioid crisis, policy makers and public health officials are developing novel policies to increase the availability of medications for opioid use disorder (OUD). An important question is to what extent geographic availability of opioid treatment programs (OTPs) is associated with treatment receipt. Understanding this association may help with developing additional policies to increase medication for OUD dispensing and improve population health outcomes. Objective: To quantify trends in dispensing methadone to Medicare beneficiaries based on proximity to an OTP. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed 2020 Medicare fee-for-service claims for methadone for beneficiaries with a recent diagnosis of OUD merged with drive times to OTP locations. Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in a Part D prescription plan and diagnosed with OUD in any of the 3 quarters before and during the 2020 quarter of interest were examined. Exposure: Drive time between the centroid of a beneficiary's zip code and the closest OTP. Main Outcomes and Measures: Quarterly methadone receipt among Medicare beneficiaries with a recent OUD diagnosis was assessed using logistic regression models. Results: In 2020, there were 640 706 Medicare beneficiaries with a recent OUD diagnosis (mean [SD] age, 62.5 [13.5] years; 55.6% female; 65.5% residing in an urban locality at the time of diagnosis). Of these beneficiaries, 9.6% lacked an OTP within a 60-minute drive time. The probability of a beneficiary receiving methadone decreased as the drive time from an OTP increased. Specifically, in urban areas, the likelihood of methadone receipt decreased by a relative 54% from a mean of 5.29% (national interval, 4.27%-6.52%) for beneficiaries who lived within a 5-minute drive of an OTP to 2.39% (national interval, 1.92%-2.98%) for those who lived within a 15-minute drive from an OTP. For rural beneficiaries, the likelihood of methadone receipt decreased by a relative 27% from a mean of 3.42% (national interval, 2.73%-4.28%) for a 5-minute drive time to 2.39% (national interval, 1.92%-2.98%) for a 15-minute drive time. Evidence of a threshold effect at a drive time of 20 minutes was observed for methadone receipt, after which the rate slowed and was similar between urban and rural beneficiaries. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the likelihood of methadone receipt may vary based on proximity to OTP facilities. Where OTPs are located may be a contributor to whether an individual receives methadone treatment.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidMedicareMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMedicare Part DMiddle AgedUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidMethadone

Identifiers

PMID40178857
PMCPMC11969284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.