ArticleJAMA network open2025
Resident Physician Intentions Regarding Unionization.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attitudes Regarding Unionization Among US Graduate Medical Trainees and Practicing Physicians.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- "Who's on Backup?"-Exploring Internal Medicine Residency Backup Coverage Systems: Findings from a National Survey.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Collective voices, healthier outcomes: the union effect in American Healthcare.npj health systems · 2026Review
- Politicization of Graduate Medical Education Antitrust Exemption Obscures Real Workforce Issues and Solutions.Journal of graduate medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Resident physicians provide frontline care to approximately 70% of hospitalized patients. After decades of relative stability with a small minority of resident physicians unionized, unionization movements have succeeded in recent years at multiple major academic medical centers. Objective: To evaluate resident physicians' unionization intention and the factors informing their unionization consideration at their institution. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide survey study was conducted in May 2023 among a cohort of resident physicians, which was established over the course of 3 academic years (2020-2023). Resident physicians were invited to participate in an end-of-study survey on contemporary topics, which included questions on unionization. Exposure: Consideration of unionization by resident physicians. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were the presence of a union at the institution for physicians in training, the presence of a movement to unionize, whether the resident physician would vote to unionize, and the factors most important in considering unionization. All measures were self-reported. Results: A total of 1235 participants (mean [SD] age, 28.8 [3.6] years; 737 of 1224 females [60%]; 791 of 1086 (73%) in their first postgraduate year) responded to survey questions regarding unionization. Twenty percent of participants (n = 249) reported that physicians in training belonged to a union at their institution. Among the 986 nonunionized resident physicians, 63% (625) reported they would vote to unionize, whereas less than 10% (96) would not vote to unionize. Pay and work hours were the most commonly cited factors in considering unionization (88% [1081 of 1235 participants] and 76% [941 of 1235 participants], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, most resident physicians (>70%) reported either being in a union or supporting unionization at their institution, citing pay and financial security as critical factors in their consideration of unionization. Future research should investigate other factors and whether unionization achieves its goals of increased pay and benefits, work hours, and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.