ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Reinforcement learning for safe autonomous two-device navigation of cerebral vessels in mechanical thrombectomy.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor: Autonomous robotic thrombectomy should be considered a near-term frontier for AI-enabled interventional radiology.European radiology · 2026Article
- Vascular geometry characterization for AI-based endovascular navigation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Human-AI Interaction in Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Toward real-time autonomous navigation: transformer-based catheter tip tracking in fluoroscopy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- A Position Statement on Endovascular Models and Effectiveness Metrics for Mechanical Thrombectomy Navigation, on Behalf of the Stakeholder Taskforce for Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Robotic Thrombectomy (START).Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- From image to insight: an AI-enabled framework for echocardiography acquisition, reconstruction, interpretation and interaction.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Advancements and challenges in autonomous endovascular interventional robotics: A comprehensive review.iScience · 2025Review
- A simulation environment for robot-assisted endovascular interventions.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAutonomous systems in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) hold promise for reducing procedure times, minimizing radiation exposure, and enhancing patient safety. However, current reinforcement learning (RL) methods only reach the carotid arteries, are not generalizable to other patient vasculatures, and do not consider safety. We propose a safe dual-device RL algorithm that can navigate beyond the carotid arteries to cerebral vessels.
methodsWe used the Simulation Open Framework Architecture to represent the intricacies of cerebral vessels, and a modified Soft Actor-Critic RL algorithm to learn, for the first time, the navigation of micro-catheters and micro-guidewires. We incorporate patient safety metrics into our reward function by integrating guidewire tip forces. Inverse RL is used with demonstrator data on 12 patient-specific vascular cases.
resultsOur simulation demonstrates successful autonomous navigation within unseen cerebral vessels, achieving a 96% success rate, 7.0 s procedure time, and 0.24 N mean forces, well below the proposed 1.5 N vessel rupture threshold.
conclusionTo the best of our knowledge, our proposed autonomous system for MT two-device navigation reaches cerebral vessels, considers safety, and is generalizable to unseen patient-specific cases for the first time. We envisage future work will extend the validation to vasculatures of different complexity and on in vitro models. While our contributions pave the way toward deploying agents in clinical settings, safety and trustworthiness will be crucial elements to consider when proposing new methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.