Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2025
Long-term left ventricular thrombosis resolution in patients receiving vitamin k antagonists: a multicenter observational study.
Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Management of Antithrombotic Therapy in Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Position Paper of the Italian Society of Hemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET).Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Guideline
- Time in therapeutic range as predictor of early left-ventricular thrombosis resolution: a retrospective cohort study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Long-term left ventricular thrombosis resolution in patients receiving vitamin K antagonists: reply to comment.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Left Ventricular Thrombus in Oncology Patients and Beyond: Imaging, Treatment Choices, and Duration.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimal duration of anticoagulant therapy for left ventricular thrombous (LVT) is unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate effectiveness and safety of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) up to 12 months in patients with LVT. Patients diagnosed with LVT between 2011 and 2023 and treated with VKAs until LVT resolution or up to 12 months were enrolled in a retrospective cohort study. Primary outcome included on-treatment LVT resolution, secondary outcomes acute ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, peripheral embolism, and major and clinically relevant non-major bleedings during the 12-month follow-up. Ninety patients were included. Median age was 66 years and 78.9% were male. Mean time in therapeutic range was 61% and 32.9% of patients received VKA monotherapy, with the remaining concomitant antiplatelet treatment. The 3, 6, 12 months cumulative incidences of LVT resolution were 27% (95% confidence intervals -95%CI-, 18%-36%), 47% (95%CI 36%-57%), and 70% (95% CI 60%-79%), respectively. At Cox regression model, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (Hazard Ratio 0.48; 95%CI 0.24-0.95) and left-ventricular aneurysms (Hazard Ratio 0.44; 95%CI 0.22-0.88) were associated with reduced LVT resolution. One patient developed an acute ischemic stroke and one an acute myocardial infarction. Two patients developed a major and four a clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Incidence of LVT resolution appeared to be higher at 12 than at 3 and 6 months of follow-up, and the rates of on-treatment acute arterial and bleeding events were low. Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and left-ventricular aneurysm appeared to be associated with a lower rates of LVT resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.