Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40178715›Full record

ArticleOral radiology2025

Bone alterations in head and neck pleomorphic adenoma: Scoping review.

C De Vriese, E Van Hul, D Loose

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oral radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Imaging features of lacrimal gland disease.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C De VrieseDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, General Hospital Vitaz, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium. Casper.DeVriese@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0002-4230-2512
E Van HulHead and Neck Radiology, Department of Radiology, General Hospital Vitaz, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
D LooseDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, General Hospital Vitaz, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8779-5584

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBone destruction adjacent to salivary gland tumors has been regarded as an indirect sign of malignancy. This scoping review explores possible bone changes due to head and neck pleomorphic adenoma and identifies risk factors for bone destruction.

methodsArticles on bone alterations in head and neck pleomorphic adenoma were searched online using PubMed, Scopus and Scholar, according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Only histopathologically confirmed pleomorphic adenomas were included. Extracted data were age, gender, location and size of tumor, duration of symptoms, type of bone erosion and recurrency status.

resultsThe search resulted in 145 pleomorphic adenomas with adjacent bone alterations. The majority caused expansile bone changes, such as cortex erosion (61.4%) and scalloping (31.0%). Extensive bone destruction was reported in 11 cases (full thickness erosion in 3.4% and bone marrow invasion in 4.1%). Significant risk factors for aggressive bone destruction were tumor size and duration of symptoms (OR = 1.08; 95% CI 1.02-1.14 and OR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.00-1.05).

conclusionsAlthough mostly bone erosion or scalloping is observed, larger or longstanding pleomorphic adenomas have the capacity of developing more extensive bone destruction, without malignant transformation. However, bone destruction is very rare in pleomorphic adenoma and more likely indicates the presence of malignancy.

Indexed as

Adenoma, PleomorphicHead and Neck NeoplasmsSalivary Gland NeoplasmsHumansRisk FactorsBone and bonesHead and neck neoplasmsNasopharynxPleomorphic adenomaRadiologyRisk factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.