Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40178710›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2025

"The significance of clinical foetal autopsy for reproductive health care: an ethical analysis in the German context".

Elisa Groff, Marta C Cohen, Florian Steger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisa GroffInstitute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany. elisa.groff@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7789-926X
Marta C CohenHistopathology Department, Sheffield Children'S Hospital NHS, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5534-444X
Florian StegerInstitute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8108-1591

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical autopsy of foetuses, stillborn babies, or neonates and the examination of the placenta help to inform the mother's decision-making and her medical care for subsequent pregnancies. Indeed, these post-mortem examinations can identify unexpected congenital malformations or the cause of repeated miscarriage or stillbirth. However, the use of clinical pathology for diagnostic purposes in the context of family planning for bereaved parents with an unfulfilled desire to have a child, and IVF couples has received little attention to date. This article applies Beauchamp and Childress' bioethical framework to identify, assess and systematically discuss ethical issues associated with the use of clinical foetal autopsy in reproductive healthcare within the German legal context. In the format of a clinical ethics consultation, the article examines the current policy on perinatal post-mortem examinations in Germany, and asks whether the clinical foetal autopsy for reproductive health purposes should be part of standard clinical examinations offered to bereaved parents. The conclusion of our research recommends clinical foetal autopsy as ethically acceptable, provided that the necessary resources are available. This recommendation is based on the ethical obligation towards the mother as the patient, which is grounded in the bioethical principles of autonomy and beneficence.

Indexed as

FetusReproductive HealthReproductive Health ServicesAutopsyBeneficenceDecision MakingEthical AnalysisFemaleGermanyHumansInfant, NewbornParentsPregnancyStillbirthClinical foetal autopsyFertility preservationHealth careMedical ethicsPerinatal mortalityReproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID40178710
PMCPMC12380977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.