ArticleVisual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art2025
Bootstrapping BI-RADS classification using large language models and transformers in breast magnetic resonance imaging reports.
Article in Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- ZACP: enhancing skin lesion classification ability using zero attention and complete perception.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2026Article
- Performance of GPT-based large language models in hepatocellular carcinoma stratification: liver function assessment, BCLC staging, and treatment recommendations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy and repeatability of ChatGPT using textual and radiographic data in reversible pulpitis: a retrospective diagnostic study.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Precision oncology: from large language models to multi-agent systems.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Stratifying Breast Lesion Risk Using BI-RADS: A Correlative Study of Imaging and Histopathology.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Extracting structured data from unstructured breast imaging reports with transformer-based models.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies among women globally. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as the final non-invasive diagnostic tool before biopsy, provides detailed free-text reports that support clinical decision-making. Therefore, the effective utilization of the information in MRI reports to make reliable decisions is crucial for patient care. This study proposes a novel method for BI-RADS classification using breast MRI reports. Large language models are employed to transform free-text reports into structured reports. Specifically, missing category information (MCI) that is absent in the free-text reports is supplemented by assigning default values to the missing categories in the structured reports. To ensure data privacy, a locally deployed Qwen-Chat model is employed. Furthermore, to enhance the domain-specific adaptability, a knowledge-driven prompt is designed. The Qwen-7B-Chat model is fine-tuned specifically for structuring breast MRI reports. To prevent information loss and enable comprehensive learning of all report details, a fusion strategy is introduced, combining free-text and structured reports to train the classification model. Experimental results show that the proposed BI-RADS classification method outperforms existing report classification methods across multiple evaluation metrics. Furthermore, an external test set from a different hospital is used to validate the robustness of the proposed approach. The proposed structured method surpasses GPT-4o in terms of performance. Ablation experiments confirm that the knowledge-driven prompt, MCI, and the fusion strategy are crucial to the model's performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.