ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Identification of menstrual blood and vaginal fluid using a 4-plex MSRE-PCR system applicable to alleged sexual assault cases.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in the identification of vaginal fluid for forensic applications.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- The Mystery of the Hidden Trace: Emerging Genetic Approaches to Improve Body Fluid Identification.Genes · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Menstrual blood and vaginal fluid are frequently encountered in conjunction with semen in alleged sexual assault cases. There are few tests with high specificity for these two body fluids and here we report on a 4-plex MSRE-PCR system for the detection of menstrual blood and vaginal fluid. The assay uses four markers in a multiplex PCR: a positive control (PC), digestive control (DC), menstrual blood-specific (MB) marker and vaginal fluid-specific (VF) marker. Menstrual blood and vaginal fluid samples were identified by the MB and VF markers as expected. Additionally, the results using samples from saliva, semen and blood were also correctly identified, with an absence of both the MB and VF markers as expected, even though MB and VF signals can occur within a few non-target body fluids (urine, nasal fluid and skin). It was found that the methylation levels at the markers for both menstrual blood and vaginal fluid have differences between individuals. The methylation level of the marker for menstrual blood was affected by the day during the menstruation cycle, which also affected the sensitivity of the test. DNA required for correct identification of menstrual blood increased from 1 ng at day 1 to 1.5 ng for day 5. The sensitivity of the assay using samples from vaginal fluid was at least 0.5 ng of DNA for confident identification. Menstrual blood samples deposited on seven types of materials frequently encountered in forensic investigations were all correctly assigned. Also, samples of simulated mixed menstrual blood and vaginal fluid were tested and the results were all concordant as expected. These data help to verify the applicability of the 4-plex MSRE-PCR system in forensic casework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40178583What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.