ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2026
Exploring neural networks to uncover information-richer features for protein interaction prediction.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Italian biophysics: insights from the 27th SIBPA congress.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2026Article
- Insights into the role of dynamical features in protein complex formation: The case of SARS-CoV-2 spike binding with ACE2.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Moving in a crowded cellular environment, proteins have to recognize and bind to each other with high specificity. This specificity reflects in a combination of geometric and chemical complementarities at the core of interacting regions that ultimately influences binding stability. Exploiting such peculiar complementarity patterns, we recently developed CIRNet, a neural network architecture capable of identifying pairs of protein core interacting residues and assisting docking algorithms by rescaling the proposed poses. Here, we present a detailed analysis of the geometric and chemical descriptors utilized by CIRNet, investigating its decision-making process to gain deeper insights into the interactions governing protein-protein binding and their interdependence. Specifically, we quantitatively assess (i) the relative importance of chemical and physical features in network training and (ii) their interplay at protein interfaces. We show that shape and hydrophobic-hydrophilic complementarities contain the most predictive information about the classification outcome. Electrostatic complementarity alone does not achieve high classification accuracy but is required to boost learning. Ultimately, our findings suggest that identifying the most information-dense features may enhance our understanding of the mechanisms driving protein-protein interactions at core interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.