Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40178543›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Practice-oriented rational assessment of anemia].

Georgia Metzgeroth, Jan Hastka

Erratum issuedAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2025
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Georgia MetzgerothIII. Medizinische Klinik, Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland. georgia.metzgeroth@umm.de.
Jan HastkaIII. Medizinische Klinik, Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anemia is frequently diagnosed in the daily clinical routine and is an indicator of a more or less severe underlying disorder. An understanding of the diverse and complex etiology is crucial for a practice-oriented diagnostic approach. In principle, there are many differential diagnoses. The diagnosis is further complicated by the fact that anemia is often multifactorial, especially in old age. A rational clarification of anemia takes epidemiological data and the individual medical history into account. Classification according to erythrocyte indices plays a central role. The most important cause of hypochromic microcytic anemia is iron deficiency, with thalassemia and anemia of chronic disorders (ACD) as differential diagnoses. Hyperchromic macrocytic anemia is mainly caused by disturbances of vitamin B12 and folic acid metabolism or the DNA synthesis. The group of normochromic normocytic anemias includes most of the subtypes of anemia. In unclear cases, a referral to a hematologist for clarification is recommended.

Indexed as

AnemiaAnemia, HypochromicAnemia, MacrocyticDiagnosis, DifferentialErythrocyte IndicesHumansThalassemiaAnemia of chronic disordersIron deficiency anemiaMegaloblastic anemiaMicrocytic anemiaNormocytic anemia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.