ArticleThe Veterinary record2025
Dental disease in rabbits under UK primary veterinary care: Clinical management and associated welfare impacts.
Article in The Veterinary record, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biofilm Dynamics and Antimicrobial Resistance in Rabbit Odontogenic Infections: A One Health Perspective.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-Guided Mandibular Alveolar Nerve Block in Rabbits: A Cadaveric Comparison of In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Approaches.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Dental disease in rabbits under UK primary veterinary care: Clinical management and associated welfare impacts.The Veterinary record · 2025Article
- Odontogenic Abscesses in Pet Rabbits: A Comprehensive Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment Advances.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Rabbit Dental Abnormalities: Investigation of Conformational Risk Factors in a Pedigree Rabbit Population.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDental disease is a painful and highly prevalent condition in companion rabbits. However, the dental disease management techniques currently employed by UK primary-care veterinarians and potential associated clinical welfare implications are scarcely described.
methodsAnonymised clinical records from primary-care practices participating in the VetCompass programme in 2019 were manually reviewed to identify cases of dental disease in rabbits. Clinical welfare implications were assessed through retrospective analysis of clinical signs, diagnostics and treatment information.
resultsA total of 2219 rabbit dental disease cases were recorded in 2019. The most frequently recorded clinical signs were reduced food intake (25.1%) and reduced faecal output (10.9%). Diagnostic dental radiography was performed in 2.2% of cases. Tooth trimming (including using burs, rasps and nail clippers) was conducted on 34.0% of cases; 6.1% of rabbits undergoing cheek teeth trimming had the procedure performed while conscious. Dietary modification was recommended for 21.5% of cases. Dental disease was the primary reason for death or a contributory factor in 51.2% of the cases that died. LIMITATIONS: Accurate dental disease diagnosis relies on detailed veterinary examination and confidence in diagnosing rabbit dental disease, which may vary.
conclusionDental disease is a major welfare concern for rabbits, as indicated by the high frequency of detrimental clinical signs, the potentially suboptimal treatment methods used in some cases and its frequency as a full or contributory cause of death. Greater owner and veterinarian awareness of dental disease signs and further veterinary education on appropriate diagnostic and treatment methods could improve the welfare of affected rabbits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.