Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40178374›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2025

Amputations in adult burns patients: a 10-year retrospective study.

E Mathews, E Chipp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E MathewsUniversity of Birmingham Medical School, UK.
E ChippUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmputation is an uncommon but potentially life-changing complication of burns. No studies of amputation among UK burns patients currently exist.

methodsA 10-year review of burns patients with amputations at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham was conducted. Descriptive analysis was undertaken to identify patient characteristics. Statistical analysis was conducted to identify relationships between patient and injury details and the number of amputations, and relationships between the number of amputations and patient outcomes.

resultsThirty-five adult burns patients (mean age 48.1 years, 65.7% male) were identified, 62.9% of whom suffered flame burns. The median total body surface area (TBSA) burned was 24%. The amputation risk among admitted burns patients was 1.2%. Major burns patients (≥25% TBSA burned) underwent more minor (

conclusionsA minority of adult burns patients underwent amputations. Patient and injury information may predict a greater number of amputations, which in turn may predict longer hospital stays and a requirement for more revisional procedures. This information could be used to better counsel patients about their likely outcomes. A multicentre case-control study is required to clarify risk factors for amputation in burns.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalBurnsAdultAgedBody Surface AreaFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAmputationBurnsDiabetesTBSA

Identifiers

PMID40178374
PMCPMC12578591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.