ArticleEcology2025
Why does animal home range size decrease with population density?
Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The vacuum effect in free-roaming dog management: Conceptual foundations, boundary conditions, and One Health implications.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- Social Group Membership With Residents Mediates Reinforcement Outcomes for a Translocated Bird.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial confinement to a home range is theorized to be a more energetically efficient method of acquiring resources than random searching due to spatial memory. Intraspecific studies that have compared home range size at different population densities have found that home ranges shrink as population density increases. This negative trend could be due to increased conspecific competition via population density increase or due to correlations between resource density and population density. We use the 10-year population cycle of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) and individual-level food-add experiments as a case study to assess whether the mechanism of the relationship between home range size and population density is related to competition from increased conspecific density or confounds between population density and resource density. Over six winters (1 December-31 March) and a 50-fold change in population density, we estimated weekly home range sizes (n = 464; 90% minimum convex polygons) of 88 radio-collared hares, of which 26 were food-supplemented. We found a negative relationship between home range size and population density in controls; home ranges decreased by 2.5 ha as hare density increased from 0.24 to 1.2 hare/ha. Food-supplemented hares showed a more negative response to population density than controls (4.0 ± 0.56 ha decrease per 1 hare/ha increase). Our results suggest that the negative trend between home range size and population density is not due to confounds between population and resource density. Likely, there is a trade-off between resource acquisition and some other density-driven constraint when foraging at high densities, which we suggest is a reduction in resource sharing to minimize competition and maintain resource familiarity at high densities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.