ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025
Fresh pork microbiota is temporally dynamic and compositionally diverse across meat, contact surfaces, and processing lines in a pork processing facility.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Environmental microbial community signatures associated withApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Microbial Ecology at the Nexus of Food Safety and Biotechnology With Ecological Mechanisms, Risks, and Emerging Innovations.International journal of food science · 2026Review
- The Microbiome Characterization of Edible Visceral Organs and Fresh Meat During Production in a Pig Processing Facility in Thailand.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to analyze the microbial profiles of meat and contact surfaces from two different processing lines in a pork processing plant, using a 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing workflow specifically designed to investigate fresh meat and environmental samples throughout a commercial production schedule. Results indicated that the microbiota differed between the meat and contact surface, both across the two processing lines and within each individual processing line. Differences in the microbiota composition were also strongly associated with both the specific processing dates and the time of day during processing. Much of this variation was associated with distinct amplicon sequence variants unique to each processing date and each processing line throughout the day. The abundance of key taxa associated with food safety and spoilage was also temporally dynamic across a production shift and was different between the meat and contact surface. Overall, the results of this study indicate significant differences in the microbial profiles of the meat and contact surfaces between two processing lines within the same plant. These differences are likely influenced by daily variation in processing and sanitation procedures, as well as differences in the design of the processing lines, which appear to affect the microbiotas of both the meat and contact surfaces.IMPORTANCEThis study provides critical knowledge that can be used as a foundation for tailored processes to improve fresh pork safety and quality, potentially customized to individual processing lines, time points within a shift, and/or production days. Additionally, this study provides a list of potential biological markers associated with food safety and quality that could be used by processors to develop and validate intervention strategies specific to different processing lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.