Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40178255›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025

Fresh pork microbiota is temporally dynamic and compositionally diverse across meat, contact surfaces, and processing lines in a pork processing facility.

A E Asmus, T N Gaire, K M Heimer, K E Belk, R S Singer, T J Johnson, N R Noyes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Environmental microbial community signatures associated withApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A E AsmusDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1585-9072
T N GaireDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1805-8051
K M HeimerHormel Foods Corporation, Austin, Minnesota, USA.
K E BelkDepartment of Animal Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
R S SingerDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
T J JohnsonDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
N R NoyesDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6149-1008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to analyze the microbial profiles of meat and contact surfaces from two different processing lines in a pork processing plant, using a 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing workflow specifically designed to investigate fresh meat and environmental samples throughout a commercial production schedule. Results indicated that the microbiota differed between the meat and contact surface, both across the two processing lines and within each individual processing line. Differences in the microbiota composition were also strongly associated with both the specific processing dates and the time of day during processing. Much of this variation was associated with distinct amplicon sequence variants unique to each processing date and each processing line throughout the day. The abundance of key taxa associated with food safety and spoilage was also temporally dynamic across a production shift and was different between the meat and contact surface. Overall, the results of this study indicate significant differences in the microbial profiles of the meat and contact surfaces between two processing lines within the same plant. These differences are likely influenced by daily variation in processing and sanitation procedures, as well as differences in the design of the processing lines, which appear to affect the microbiotas of both the meat and contact surfaces.IMPORTANCEThis study provides critical knowledge that can be used as a foundation for tailored processes to improve fresh pork safety and quality, potentially customized to individual processing lines, time points within a shift, and/or production days. Additionally, this study provides a list of potential biological markers associated with food safety and quality that could be used by processors to develop and validate intervention strategies specific to different processing lines.

Indexed as

BacteriaFood HandlingFood MicrobiologyMeatMicrobiotaPork MeatRed MeatAnimalsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAfood contact surfacesfood safetyfresh porkmicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID40178255
PMCPMC12016530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.