Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2025
Enhanced Influenza Vaccines Extend A(H3N2) Antibody Reactivity in Older Adults but Prior Vaccination Effects Persist.
Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03330132 (Immunogenicity of Alternative Annual Influenza Vaccination Strategies in Older Adults in Hong Kong - a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Immunogenicity of Alternative Annual Influenza Vaccination Strategies in Older Adults in Hong Kong - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Dual Role of Preexisting Immunity in Influenza: Protective Recall Versus Constraint of Novel Responses.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Repeat Influenza Vaccination Effects in 2021/22 and 2022/23 in a Community-Based Cohort in Hong Kong.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Influenza vaccine-specific CD4NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Australia During 2017-2019.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfluenza vaccine effectiveness can be reduced in older adults and among repeatedly vaccinated groups. Results from year 1 of "PIVOT," a randomized trial among adults aged ≥65 years in Hong Kong, showed that adjuvanted (Adj), high-dose (HD), and recombinant hemagglutinin (rHA) vaccines induced greater antibody responses against vaccine viruses than standard-dose (SD) influenza vaccine. Here, we examine the breadth of A(H3N2)-reactive antibodies induced during the first 2 study years (2017/2018, 2018/2019), and compare participants who received influenza vaccination annually, or not at all, for 5 years preceding enrollment.
methods14-20 PIVOT participants per vaccine and prior vaccination group (0/5 or 5/5 prior years) who provided sera on days 0, 30, and 182 in year 1 and days 0 and 30 in year 2 were assessed. Hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody titers were measured against 30 viruses spanning 1968 to 2018.
resultsIn year 1, rHA and Adj but not HD vaccines induced titers ≥40 and titer rises ≥4-fold (seroconversion) against significantly more strains than SD vaccine among participants vaccinated 0/5 prior years. Only rHA and Adj vaccines induced titers ≥40 against post-vaccine strains. Antibody responses were poor among participants vaccinated 5/5 compared with 0/5 prior years and only rHA increased the breadth of seroconversion compared with the SD vaccine in this group. Antibody responses were weaker across groups in year 2.
conclusionsThe results suggest that Adj and particularly rHA vaccines may improve the breadth of protection against A(H3N2) viruses but may not overcome attenuating effects of repeated vaccination in older adults. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03330132.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.